Local Latin hypercube refinement for multi-objective design uncertainty optimization®

被引:10
作者
Bogoclu, Can [1 ,2 ]
Roos, Dirk [2 ]
Nestorovic, Tamara [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Fac Civil & Environm Engn, Inst Computat Engn, Mech Adapt Syst, Univ Str 150,Bldg ICFW 03-725, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
[2] Niederrhein Univ Appl Sci, Fac Mech & Proc Engn, Inst Modelling & High Performance Comp, Reinarzstr 49, D-47805 Krefeld, Germany
关键词
Multi-objective reliability-based robust design optimization; Surrogate model; Sequential sampling; Gaussian process; Support vector regression; RELIABILITY-BASED OPTIMIZATION; RESPONSE-SURFACE METHOD; ROBUST OPTIMIZATION; CRASHWORTHINESS DESIGN; GENETIC ALGORITHM; METHODOLOGY; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107807
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Optimizing the reliability and the robustness of a design is important but often unaffordable due to high sample requirements. Surrogate models based on statistical and machine learning methods are used to increase the sample efficiency. However, for higher dimensional or multi-modal systems, surrogate models may also require a large amount of samples to achieve good results. We propose a sequential sampling strategy for the surrogate based solution of multi-objective reliability based robust design optimization problems. Proposed local Latin hypercube refinement (LoLHR) strategy is model-agnostic and can be combined with any surrogate model because there is no free lunch but possibly a budget one. The proposed method is compared to stationary sampling as well as other proposed strategies from the literature. Gaussian process and support vector regression are both used as surrogate models. Empirical evidence is presented, showing that LoLHR achieves on average better results compared to other surrogate based strategies on the tested examples. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 112 条
  • [41] A DISTRIBUTION-FREE APPROACH TO INDUCING RANK CORRELATION AMONG INPUT VARIABLES
    IMAN, RL
    CONOVER, WJ
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS PART B-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 1982, 11 (03): : 311 - 334
  • [42] Jones E., 2001, SCIPY OPEN SOURCE SC, DOI DOI 10.1038/S41592-019-0686-2
  • [43] Joseph VR, 2008, STAT SINICA, V18, P171
  • [44] EFFICIENT ALGORITHM FOR 2ND-ORDER RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS
    KIUREGHIAN, AD
    DESTEFANO, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 1991, 117 (12): : 2904 - 2923
  • [45] Knowles J., 1999, P 1999 C EVOLUTIONAR, V1, P98, DOI [DOI 10.1109/CEC.1999.781913, 10.1109/CEC.1999.781913]
  • [46] Design for six sigma through robust optimization
    Koch, PN
    Yang, RJ
    Gu, L
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2004, 26 (3-4) : 235 - 248
  • [47] Krige D.G., 1951, J CHEM METAL MIN SOC
  • [48] Dimension reduction method for reliability-based robust design optimization
    Lee, Ikjin
    Choi, K. K.
    Du, Liu
    Gorsich, David
    [J]. COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2008, 86 (13-14) : 1550 - 1562
  • [49] An adaptive importance sampling method with a Kriging metamodel to calculate failure probability
    Lee, Seunggyu
    Kim, Jae Hoon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 31 (12) : 5769 - 5778
  • [50] Reliability-based design optimization of a spar-type floating offshore wind turbine support structure
    Leimeister, Mareike
    Kolios, Athanasios
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 213