Local Latin hypercube refinement for multi-objective design uncertainty optimization®

被引:10
作者
Bogoclu, Can [1 ,2 ]
Roos, Dirk [2 ]
Nestorovic, Tamara [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Fac Civil & Environm Engn, Inst Computat Engn, Mech Adapt Syst, Univ Str 150,Bldg ICFW 03-725, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
[2] Niederrhein Univ Appl Sci, Fac Mech & Proc Engn, Inst Modelling & High Performance Comp, Reinarzstr 49, D-47805 Krefeld, Germany
关键词
Multi-objective reliability-based robust design optimization; Surrogate model; Sequential sampling; Gaussian process; Support vector regression; RELIABILITY-BASED OPTIMIZATION; RESPONSE-SURFACE METHOD; ROBUST OPTIMIZATION; CRASHWORTHINESS DESIGN; GENETIC ALGORITHM; METHODOLOGY; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107807
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Optimizing the reliability and the robustness of a design is important but often unaffordable due to high sample requirements. Surrogate models based on statistical and machine learning methods are used to increase the sample efficiency. However, for higher dimensional or multi-modal systems, surrogate models may also require a large amount of samples to achieve good results. We propose a sequential sampling strategy for the surrogate based solution of multi-objective reliability based robust design optimization problems. Proposed local Latin hypercube refinement (LoLHR) strategy is model-agnostic and can be combined with any surrogate model because there is no free lunch but possibly a budget one. The proposed method is compared to stationary sampling as well as other proposed strategies from the literature. Gaussian process and support vector regression are both used as surrogate models. Empirical evidence is presented, showing that LoLHR achieves on average better results compared to other surrogate based strategies on the tested examples. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 112 条
  • [1] Reliability-based analysis and design optimization of electrostatically actuated MEMS
    Allen, M
    Raulli, M
    Maute, K
    Frangopol, DM
    [J]. COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2004, 82 (13-14) : 1007 - 1020
  • [2] Ankerst M, 1999, SIGMOD RECORD, VOL 28, NO 2 - JUNE 1999, P49
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, ENG DESIGN VIA SURRO
  • [4] An approach for reliability-based robust design optimisation of angle-ply composites
    Antonio, Carlos Conceicao
    Hoffbauer, Luisa N.
    [J]. COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2009, 90 (01) : 53 - 59
  • [5] Benchmark study of numerical methods for reliability-based design optimization
    Aoues, Younes
    Chateauneuf, Alaa
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2010, 41 (02) : 277 - 294
  • [6] Araghi O. Vahid, 2009, FRICTION INDUCED VIB
  • [7] Principles of robust design methodology
    Arvidsson, Martin
    Gremyr, Ida
    [J]. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 24 (01) : 23 - 35
  • [8] Bichon B., 2009, 50 AIAA ASME ASCE AH, DOI [DOI 10.2514/6.2009-2261, 10.2514/6.2009-2261.]
  • [9] PROBABILITY INTEGRATION BY DIRECTIONAL SIMULATION
    BJERAGER, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 1988, 114 (08): : 1285 - 1302
  • [10] Bogoclu C., 2017, 12 INT C STRUCT SAF