Understanding the residential energy efficiency financing coverage gap and market potential

被引:26
作者
Forrester, Sydney P. [1 ]
Reames, Tony G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Energy efficiency; Moderate income; Alternative financing; Energy justice; On-bill recovery; Green bank; CO-BENEFITS; JUSTICE; TRANSITION; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114307
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Access to upfront capital remains a primary barrier in residential energy efficiency adoption. Government-sponsored programs exist for low-income households while traditional financing serves creditworthy households. However, there remains a coverage gap for those with moderate incomes too high to qualify for low-income programs, but without access to friendly capital. With limited research in this space, this study aims to: (1) develop a model to estimate the number of households in the coverage gap; and (2) explore their spatial distribution. For the state of Michigan, we used data from the US Census Bureau and approximately 12,000 green bank loans to estimate the energy efficiency financing coverage gap across the state's 83 counties using a binomial mixed model. We found that credit score and income interacted to largely determine whether an applicant was approved. Households in the highest income quintile achieved a 50% chance of approval with a moderate credit score (662) while those in the lowest needed a very high credit score (715) for the same odds. Overall, this created an estimated 12% energy efficiency financing coverage gap of households statewide, with individual county levels between 0% and 24%. Broadly, understanding the market potential and spatial distribution of this coverage gap could allow impact-driven financiers such as green banks or community development financial institutions to expand programs that may offer alternative underwriting criteria. Expanding loan access to this underserved market can promote energy system improvements, policy goals, household living conditions, and an equitable clean energy transition.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], Green Banks
[2]  
[Anonymous], RECS DAT SHOW DECR E
[3]  
Barret J, 2016, LENDING ENERGY EFFIC
[4]   The intersection of energy and justice: Modeling the spatial, racial/ethnic and socioeconomic patterns of urban residential heating consumption and efficiency in Detroit, Michigan [J].
Bednar, Dominic J. ;
Reames, Tony Gerard ;
Keoleian, Gregory A. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2017, 143 :25-34
[5]  
Better Buildings for Michigan, 2013, BETTER BUILDINGS MIC
[6]   Do Energy Burdens Contribute to Economic Poverty in the United States? A Panel Analysis [J].
Bohr, Jeremiah ;
McCreery, Anna C. .
SOCIAL FORCES, 2020, 99 (01) :155-177
[7]  
Buonocore JJ, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P100, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2771, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2771]
[8]   A framework for evaluating geographic disparities in energy transition vulnerability [J].
Carley, Sanya ;
Evans, Tom P. ;
Graff, Michelle ;
Konisky, David M. .
NATURE ENERGY, 2018, 3 (08) :621-627
[9]  
Cluett R., 2016, Building Better Energy Efficiency Programs for Low-Income Households
[10]  
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, WHAT IS FICO SCOR