Optimizing wind farm layout by addressing energy-variance trade-off: A single-objective optimization approach

被引:16
作者
Wang, Longyan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zuo, Ming J. [3 ]
Xu, Jian [1 ]
Zhou, Yunkai [1 ]
Tan, Andy C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ, Res Ctr Fluid Machinery Engn & Technol, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Univ, Inst Fluid Engn Equipment, JITRI, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Alberta, Dept Mech Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
[4] Univ Tunku Abdul Rahman, LKC Fac Engn & Sci, Kajang 43000, Selangor, Malaysia
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Wind farm layout; Wind power variability; Weighted optimization; Confidence interval optimization; Monte Carlo method; PLACEMENT; TURBINES; DESIGN; GROWTH; SPEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2019.116149
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Wind farm layout optimization results depend on the optimization objectives, such as power output and variance. This paper investigates an alternative strategy for wind farm layout optimization by trading off the mean wind power output and power variance. Two optimization schemes, the weighted optimization and confidence interval optimization are compared in term of their performances on trading off energy-variance. For the weighted optimization, the objective function weight value alpha varies from 0 to 1 (implying the optimization objective shifts its weight from the power variance to the power output), while for the confidence interval (CI) optimization, either the lower or the upper limit of power output CI is maximized/minimized. It is found that the CI maximization achieves a trade-off of mean power output and power variance similar to the weighted optimization with alpha >= 0.6, and the same individual power output range (192 kWe207 kW) is obtained with staggered placements of wind turbines. The CI minimization obtains a trade-off of average power output and power variance close to the weighted optimization with alpha <= 0.4, and the optimal wind turbine locations are aligned. The advantage of CI optimization lies on its capability of predicting the power output uncertainty. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Optimization of wind turbines siting in a wind farm using genetic algorithm based local search [J].
Abdelsalam, Ali M. ;
El-Shorbagy, M. A. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 123 :748-755
[2]  
Afanasyeva S, 2013, P EUROPEAN WIND ENER, P1
[3]   Quantifying Short-Term Wind Power Variability Using the Conditional Range Metric [J].
Boutsika, Thekla ;
Santoso, Surya .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2012, 3 (03) :369-378
[4]   Wake effects of large offshore wind farms identified from satellite SAR [J].
Christiansen, MB ;
Hasager, CB .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 98 (2-3) :251-268
[5]  
Contributors W., GENETIC ALGORITHM
[6]   Green growth: The economic impacts of large-scale renewable energy development in China [J].
Dai, Hancheng ;
Xie, Xuxuan ;
Xie, Yang ;
Liu, Jian ;
Masui, Toshihiko .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 162 :435-449
[7]   Wind farm power production in the changing wind: Robustness quantification and layout optimization [J].
Feng, Ju ;
Shen, Wen Zhong .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 148 :905-914
[8]   Modelling Wind for Wind Farm Layout Optimization Using Joint Distribution of Wind Speed and Wind Direction [J].
Feng, Ju ;
Shen, Wen Zhong .
ENERGIES, 2015, 8 (04) :3075-3092
[9]   ON THE WIND-SPEED REDUCTION IN THE CENTER OF LARGE CLUSTERS OF WIND TURBINES [J].
FRANDSEN, S .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 1992, 39 (1-3) :251-265
[10]   Evaluation of the wind direction uncertainty and its impact on wake modeling at the Horns Rev offshore wind farm [J].
Gaumond, M. ;
Rethore, P. -E. ;
Ott, S. ;
Pena, A. ;
Bechmann, A. ;
Hansen, K. S. .
WIND ENERGY, 2014, 17 (08) :1169-1178