Which goals are driving the Energiewende? Making sense of the German Energy Transformation

被引:77
作者
Joas, Fabian [1 ,2 ]
Pahle, Michael [1 ]
Flachsland, Christian [2 ,3 ]
Joas, Amani [4 ]
机构
[1] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res PIK, Telegraphenberg A 31, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Mercator Res Inst Global Commons & Climate Change, Torgauer Str 12-15, D-10829 Berlin, Germany
[3] Hertie Sch Governance, Friedrichstr 180, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[4] Next Kraftwerke GmbH, Lichtstr 43 g, D-50825 Cologne, Germany
关键词
Energiewende; German energy transition; Goals and objectives of energy policy; Co-benefits; ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In 2010, Germany agreed a plan to increase the share of renewables in power consumption to 80% by 2050, and in 2011 the decision was taken to phase-out nuclear power by 2022. This policy is now widely known as the "Energiewende". While many global observers consider this program to be primarily driven by the need to tackle climate change, the precise political goals of the Energiewende are, by and large, unclear. In our study we compiled a list of 14 goals put forward in political debates and conducted a "mapping" survey among more than 50 policy experts. We asked them to prioritize the goals based on their personal views and provide arguments for their rankings in ensuing interviews. Our main findings are as follows: (i) a large majority named climate protection among the top-level goals of the Energiewende; at the same time, around 80% of all participants also identified additional goals; (ii) when asked if the Energiewende would make sense even if climate change did not exist, two thirds of the participants agreed, which, when taken with the first finding, demonstrates that the goals and motivations driving the Energiewende are more complex than often assumed. We conclude that for the sake of effective and efficient policies and ever rising climate policy ambition, a public debate and clear specification of the top-level goals are indispensable. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 51
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, NY TIMES
[2]  
[Anonymous], STELLUNGNAHME ZUM ZW
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, POLICY ANAL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change.Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
[5]  
Beise Marian, 1999, 5 ASEAT C DEM MARK U
[6]  
Bundesregierung, 2015, DIE ENERGIE DER ZUKU
[7]  
Dewey J., 1986, THE LATER WORKS, p[1925, 9]
[8]  
Dunn W.N., 2007, PUBLIC POLICY ANALYS
[9]   Cartography of pathways: A new model for environmental policy assessments [J].
Edenhofer, Ottmar ;
Kowarsch, Martin .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2015, 51 :56-64
[10]   When is a goal rational? [J].
Edvardsson, K ;
Hansson, S .
SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2005, 24 (02) :343-361