Reproducibility of 18F-FDG PET uptake measurements in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma on both PET/CT and PET/MR

被引:30
作者
Rasmussen, J. H. [1 ]
Fischer, B. M. [2 ]
Aznar, M. C. [1 ]
Hansen, A. E. [2 ]
Vogelius, I. R. [1 ]
Lofgren, J. [2 ]
Andersen, F. L. [2 ]
Loft, A. [2 ]
Kjaer, A. [2 ]
Hojgaard, L. [2 ]
Specht, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Oncol, Sect Radiotherapy, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Clin Physiol Nucl Med & PET, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
STANDARDIZED UPTAKE VALUE; TOTAL LESION GLYCOLYSIS; TUMOR VOLUME; FDG-PET/CT; REPEATABILITY; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20140655
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate reproducibility of fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) uptake on F-18-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and F-18-FDG PET/MR scans in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Methods: 30 patients with HNSCC were included in this prospective study. The patients were scanned twice before radiotherapy treatment with both PET/CT and PET/MR. Patients were scanned on the same scanners, 3 days apart and according to the same protocol. Metabolic tumour activity was measured by the maximum and peak standardized uptake value (SUVmax and SUVpeak, respectively), and total lesion glycolysis from the metabolic tumour volume defined from >= 50% SUVmax. Bland-Altman analysis with limits of agreement, coefficient of variation (CV) from the two modalities were performed in order to test the reproducibility. Furthermore, CVs from SUVmax and SUVpeak were compared. The area under the curve from cumulative SUV-volume histograms were measured and tested for reproducibility of the distribution of F-18-FDG uptake. Results: 24 patients had two pre-treatment PET/CT scans and 21 patients had two pre-treatment PET/MR scans available for further analyses. Mean difference for SUVmax, peak and mean was approximately 4% for PET/CT and 3% for PET/MR, with 95% limits of agreement less than +/- 20%. CV was small (5-7%) for both modalities. There was no significant difference in CVs between PET/CT and PET/MR (p = 0.31). SUVmax was not more reproducible than SUVpeak (p = 0.09). Conclusion: F-18-FDG uptake in PET/CT and PET/MR is highly reproducible and we found no difference in reproducibility between PET/CT and PET/MR. Advances in knowledge: This is the first report to test reproducibility of PET/CT and PET/MR.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: the potential role of PET/MRI [J].
Becker, Minerva ;
Zaidi, Habib .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 87 (1036)
[2]   Feasibility of simultaneous PET/MR imaging in the head and upper neck area [J].
Boss, Andreas ;
Stegger, Lars ;
Bisdas, Sotirios ;
Kolb, Armin ;
Schwenzer, Nina ;
Pfister, Markus ;
Claussen, Claus D. ;
Pichler, Bernd J. ;
Pfannenberg, Christina .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (07) :1439-1446
[3]   Oncologic PET/MRI, Part 1: Tumors of the Brain, Head and Neck, Chest, Abdomen, and Pelvis [J].
Buchbender, Christian ;
Heusner, Till A. ;
Lauenstein, Thomas C. ;
Bockisch, Andreas ;
Antoch, Gerald .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2012, 53 (06) :928-938
[4]   Total lesion glycolysis by 18F-FDG PET/CT is a reliable predictor of prognosis in soft-tissue sarcoma [J].
Choi, Eun-Seok ;
Ha, Seung-Gyun ;
Kim, Han-Soo ;
Ha, Jae Hong ;
Paeng, Jin Chul ;
Han, Ilkyu .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2013, 40 (12) :1836-1842
[5]   Repeatability of 18F-FDG Uptake Measurements in Tumors: A Metaanalysis [J].
de Langen, Adrianus J. ;
Vincent, Andrew ;
Velasquez, Linda M. ;
van Tinteren, Harm ;
Boellaard, Ronald ;
Shankar, Lalitha K. ;
Boers, Maarten ;
Smit, Egbert F. ;
Stroobants, Sigrid ;
Weber, Wolfgang A. ;
Hoekstra, Otto S. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2012, 53 (05) :701-708
[6]   Exploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predicting cancer treatment outcomes [J].
El Naqa, I. ;
Grigsby, P. W. ;
Apte, A. ;
Kidd, E. ;
Donnelly, E. ;
Khullar, D. ;
Chaudhari, S. ;
Yang, D. ;
Schmitt, M. ;
Laforest, Richard ;
Thorstad, W. L. ;
Deasy, J. O. .
PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2009, 42 (06) :1162-1171
[7]   Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology [J].
Fletcher, James W. ;
Djulbegovic, Benjamin ;
Soares, Heloisa P. ;
Siegel, Barry A. ;
Lowe, Val J. ;
Lyman, Gary H. ;
Coleman, R. Edward ;
Wahl, Richard ;
Paschold, John Christopher ;
Avrill, Norbert ;
Einhorn, Lawrence H. ;
Suh, W. Warren ;
Samson'O, David ;
Delbekell, Dominique ;
Gorman, Mark ;
Shields, Anthony F. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2008, 49 (03) :480-508
[8]   Reproducibility of 18F-FDG and 3′-Deoxy-3′-18F-Fluorothymidine PET Tumor Volume Measurements [J].
Hatt, Mathieu ;
Rest, Catherine Cheze-Le ;
Aboagye, Eric O. ;
Kenny, Laura M. ;
Rosso, Lula ;
Turkheimer, Federico E. ;
Albarghach, Nidal M. ;
Metges, Jean-Philippe ;
Pradier, Olivier ;
Visvikis, Dimitris .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 51 (09) :1368-1376
[9]   Volume-based assessment by 18F-FDG PET/CT predicts survival in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer [J].
Hyun, Seung Hyup ;
Ahn, Hee Kyung ;
Kim, Hojoong ;
Ahn, Myung-Ju ;
Park, Keunchil ;
Ahn, Yong Chan ;
Kim, Jhingook ;
Shim, Young Mog ;
Choi, Joon Young .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2014, 41 (01) :50-58
[10]   Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner [J].
Jakoby, B. W. ;
Bercier, Y. ;
Conti, M. ;
Casey, M. E. ;
Bendriem, B. ;
Townsend, D. W. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (08) :2375-2389