US electricity infrastructure of the future: Generation and transmission pathways through 2050

被引:44
作者
Jayadev, Gopika [1 ]
Leibowicz, Benjamin D. [1 ]
Kutanoglu, Erhan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Operat Res & Ind Engn, 204 E Dean Keeton St,Stop C2200, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Energy modeling; Electricity; Generation; Transmission; Optimization; United States; VARIABLE RENEWABLE ENERGY; POWER SECTOR; NATURAL-GAS; EMF; 32; COST; MODEL; CAPACITY; SYSTEMS; SOLAR; WIND;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114267
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The future development of the U.S. electricity sector will be shaped by technological, economic, and policy drivers whose trajectories are highly uncertain. In this article, we develop an optimization model for the integrated generation and transmission system in the continental U.S. and use it to explore electricity infrastructure pathways from the present through 2050. By comparing and contrasting results from numerous scenarios and sensitivity settings, we ultimately affirm five key policy-relevant insights. (1) U.S. electricity can be substantially decarbonized at modest cost, but complete decarbonization is very costly. (2) Significant expansion of solar PV and wind to combine for at least 40% of the generation mix by 2050 is fairly certain, although solar PV and battery storage are more affected by economic and policy assumptions than wind. (3) Investments in long-distance transmission are very limited, while investments in battery storage are much greater, under a wide range of assumptions. (4) Optimal solutions include large investments in natural gas capacity, but gas capacity utilization rates decline steadily and significantly. (5) Cost structures shift away from operating expenditures and toward capital expenditures, especially under climate policy. We conclude our article by discussing the policy implications of these findings.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, NEW STREAM-REACH DEVELOPMENT RESOURCE ASSESSMENT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, FERC Form 714: Annual Electric Balancing Authority Area and Planning Area Report
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Documentation for the MARKAL Family of Models (Issue October)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, International energy outlook 2021, DOI DOI 10.1787/EC2FD78D-EN
[5]   Pathways toward zero-carbon electricity required for climate stabilization [J].
Audoly, Richard ;
Vogt-Schilb, Adrien ;
Guivarch, Celine ;
Pfeiffer, Alexander .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 225 :884-901
[6]   A retrospective analysis of benefits and impacts of US renewable portfolio standards [J].
Barbose, Galen ;
Wiser, Ryan ;
Heeter, Jenny ;
Mai, Trieu ;
Bird, Lori ;
Bolinger, Mark ;
Carpenter, Alberta ;
Heath, Garvin ;
Keyser, David ;
Macknick, Jordan ;
Mills, Andrew ;
Millstein, Dev .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 96 :645-660
[7]   Economic and technical challenges of flexible operations under large-scale variable renewable deployment [J].
Bistline, John E. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 64 :363-372
[8]  
Blanford G., 2014, Energy J., V35, P137
[9]   Capacity payment mechanisms and investment incentives in restructured electricity markets [J].
Brown, David P. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 74 :131-142
[10]   Decarbonizing power and transportation at the urban scale: An analysis of the Austin, Texas Community Climate Plan [J].
Brozynski, Max T. ;
Leibowicz, Benjamin D. .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2018, 43 :41-54