A comparison of different DNA extraction methods and molecular techniques for the detection and identification of foodborne pathogens

被引:2
作者
Papatheodorou, Spyridon Andreas [1 ]
Halvatsiotis, Panagiotis [2 ]
Houhoula, Dimitra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ West Attica, Sch Food Sci, Dept Food Sci & Technol, Aigaleo, Greece
[2] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Med Sch, Propaedeut Dept Internal Med 2, ATTIKON Univ Hosp, Chaidari, Greece
来源
AIMS MICROBIOLOGY | 2021年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
DNA extraction methods; Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium; Listeria monocytogenes; PCR; LAMP; Limit of detection; MEDIATED ISOTHERMAL AMPLIFICATION; LISTERIA-MONOCYTOGENES;
D O I
10.3934/microbiol.2021019
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Foodborne infections continue to plague Europe. Food safety monitoring is in crisis as the existing techniques for detecting pathogens do not keep up with the global rising of food production and consumption. Thus, the development of innovative techniques for detecting and identifying pathogenic bacteria has become critical. The aim of the present study was firstly to develop an innovative simple and low cost method of extracting bacterial DNA from contaminated food and water samples with Salmonella enteric(a) subsp. enteric(a) serovar Typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes and its comparison with two commercial DNA extraction kits (Qiagen, MachereyNagel). Finally, pathogens' detection using two molecular techniques (PCR-electrophoresis, LAMP), in order to evaluate the best combination of DNA extraction and identification based on their sensitivity, cost, rapidity and simplicity. Considering the above criteria, among them, best was proved an in-house bacterial DNA extraction method, based on the chloroform-isoamyl alcohol protocol, with certain modifications. This technique showed statistically similar results in terms of sensitivity, compared to the commercial kits, while at the same time maintained high rapidity and much lower cost. Lastly, between the molecular techniques, LAMP was found more promising considering its simplicity, high rapidity and sensitivity. Conclusively, the in-house DNA extraction method along with the LAMP technique, was proven to be the best among the presented combinations.
引用
收藏
页码:304 / 319
页数:16
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Anju P., 2014, International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, V3, P1028
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, BURD FOODB DIS WHO E
  • [3] Baraketi Amina., 2018, Biosensing_technologies for the detection of pathogens-a prospective way for rapid analysis, P53, DOI DOI 10.5772/INTECHOPEN.74421
  • [4] Benford D, 2014, EFSA J, V12, DOI [10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3802, 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4260]
  • [5] DNA-based bead array technology for simultaneous identification of eleven foodborne pathogens in chicken meat
    Charlermroj, Ratthaphol
    Makornwattana, Manlika
    Phuengwas, Sudtida
    Meerak, Jomkhwan
    Pichpol, Duangporn
    Karoonuthaisiri, Nitsara
    [J]. FOOD CONTROL, 2019, 101 : 81 - 88
  • [6] Tolerance of loop-mediated isothermal amplification to a culture medium and biological substances
    Kaneko, Hisatoshi
    Kawana, Takashi
    Fukushima, Eiko
    Suzutani, Tatsuo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL METHODS, 2007, 70 (03): : 499 - 501
  • [7] Khalil ZK., 2017, INTE J ADV RES, V5, P900
  • [8] Comparative Evaluation of the LAMP Assay and PCR-Based Assays for the Rapid Detection of Altemaria solani
    Khan, Mehran
    Wang, Rongbo
    Li, Benjin
    Liu, Peiqing
    Weng, Qiyong
    Chen, Qinghe
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [9] Klancnik A, 2012, Polymerase Chain Reaction, P195, DOI [DOI 10.5772/38551, 10.5772/38551]
  • [10] Rapid methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens: principles, applications, advantages and limitations
    Law, Jodi Woan-Fei
    Ab Mutalib, Nurul-Syakima
    Chan, Kok-Gan
    Lee, Learn-Han
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 5