Exploring the impact of achievement goals orientation and study engagement on nursing students' approaches to learning

被引:11
作者
Palos, Ramona [1 ]
机构
[1] West Univ Timisoara, Dept Psychol, Timisoara, Romania
关键词
Deep and surface approaches to learning; achievement goals orientation; study engagement; ACADEMIC-PERFORMANCE; MOTIVATION; BURNOUT; SCHOOL; INTELLIGENCE; PERSONALITY; PREDICTORS; DEEP; UNDERGRADUATE;
D O I
10.1080/03055698.2018.1555454
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Three main categories of variables which impact the approach to learning were synthesised, and they are linked to the learning context, the way that students perceive this context and the students' characteristics. Despite the research which emphasised the influence of these variables on approaches to learning in different areas, only a few studies have addressed their effect on nursing education. The purpose of the present study was to investigate if achievement goals orientation and study engagement predict nursing students' approaches to learning. A total of 120 second-year nursing students included in a traditional educational programme for nurses in Romania were invited to fill in three questionnaires. The results revealed that students' preference for a deep approach to learning is predicted by the mastery-approach goals, students' vigour and their dedication. The surface approach to learning was influenced by mastery-avoidance goals, while study engagement did not impact a surface approach to learning. These results add new knowledge regarding the high impact of study engagement on learning, and support the need to find ways to enhance it in the instructional process. From the practical perspective, these personal variables can be influenced by teachers, who can optimise the learning process and finally the students' academic achievement.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 220
页数:16
相关论文
共 52 条
[2]   Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness [J].
Baeten, Marlies ;
Kyndt, Eva ;
Struyven, Katrien ;
Dochy, Filip .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2010, 5 (03) :243-260
[3]   The interrelationships between student approaches to learning and group work [J].
Beccaria, Lisa ;
Kek, Megan ;
Huijser, Henk ;
Rose, Jayln ;
Kimmins, Lindy .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2014, 34 (07) :1094-1103
[4]   The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F [J].
Biggs, J ;
Kember, D ;
Leung, DYP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 71 :133-149
[5]   Engagement as an inherent aspect of the learning process [J].
Boekaerts, Monique .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2016, 43 :76-83
[6]   Motivational profile and academic achievement among students enrolled in different schooling tracks [J].
Bouffard, T ;
Couture, N .
EDUCATIONAL STUDIES, 2003, 29 (01) :19-38
[7]  
Campbell J., 2001, TEACHERS TEACHING, V7, P173, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13540600120054964, 10.1080/01443410500344720, DOI 10.1080/01443410500344720]
[8]   Personality, intelligence and approaches to learning as predictors of academic performance [J].
Chamorro-Premuzic, Tomas ;
Furnham, Adrian .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2008, 44 (07) :1596-1603
[9]  
Coates H., 2008, AUSTRALASIAN STUDENT
[10]   Extending the 2 x 2 Achievement Goal Framework: Development of a Measure of Scientific Achievement Goals [J].
Deemer, Eric D. ;
Carter, Alice P. ;
Lobrano, Michael T. .
JOURNAL OF CAREER ASSESSMENT, 2010, 18 (04) :376-392