Performance measure and tool for benchmarking metaheuristic optimization algorithms

被引:3
|
作者
Schott, Francois [1 ]
Chamoret, Dominique [2 ]
Baron, Thomas [3 ]
Salmon, Sebastien [4 ]
Meyer, Yann [5 ]
机构
[1] Percipio Robot, Maison Microtech, 18 Rue Alain Savary, Besancon, France
[2] UTBM, UBFC, CNRS, ICB UMR 6303, Belfort, France
[3] Univ Bourgogne Franche Comte, FEMTO ST Inst, CNRS, ENSMM Time & Frequency Dept, Besancon, France
[4] My OCCS, Besancon, France
[5] Univ Savoie Mt Blanc, SYMME, FR-74000 Annecy, France
来源
关键词
Optimization algorithm; Performance Measure; Benchmark; DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.22055/JACM.2021.37664.3060
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
In the last decade, many new algorithms have been proposed to solve optimization problems. Most of them are meta-heuristic algorithms. The issue of accurate performance measure of algorithms is still under discussion in the scientific community. Therefore, a new scoring strategy via a new benchmark is proposed. The idea of this new tool is to determine a score, a measure of efficiency taking into account both the end value of the optimization and the convergence speed. This measure is based on an aggregate of statistical results of different optimization problems. These problems are judiciously chosen to cover as broad a spectrum of resolution configurations as possible. They are defined by combinations of several parameters: dimensions, objective functions and evaluation limit on dimension ratios. Aggregation methods are chosen and set in order to make the problem weight relevant according to the computed score. This scoring strategy is compared to the CEC one thanks to the results of different algorithms: PSO, CMAES, Genetic Algorithm, Cuttlefish and simulated annealing.
引用
收藏
页码:1803 / 1813
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance assessment of the metaheuristic optimization algorithms: an exhaustive review
    A. Hanif Halim
    I. Ismail
    Swagatam Das
    Artificial Intelligence Review, 2021, 54 : 2323 - 2409
  • [2] Performance assessment of the metaheuristic optimization algorithms: an exhaustive review
    Halim, A. Hanif
    Ismail, I.
    Das, Swagatam
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2021, 54 (03) : 2323 - 2409
  • [3] Metaheuristic optimization frameworks: a survey and benchmarking
    Antonio Parejo, Jose
    Ruiz-Cortes, Antonio
    Lozano, Sebastian
    Fernandez, Pablo
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2012, 16 (03) : 527 - 561
  • [4] Metaheuristic optimization frameworks: a survey and benchmarking
    José Antonio Parejo
    Antonio Ruiz-Cortés
    Sebastián Lozano
    Pablo Fernandez
    Soft Computing, 2012, 16 : 527 - 561
  • [5] A Comparison of Metaheuristic Algorithms for Structural Optimization: Performance and Efficiency Analysis
    Ghaemifard, Saeedeh
    Ghannadiasl, Amin
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2024, 2024
  • [6] Multi-Purpose Metaheuristic Optimization Performance Mixing of Algorithms
    Eroz, Eyup
    Tanyildizi, Erkan
    2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DATA PROCESSING (IDAP 2019), 2019,
  • [7] KU Battle of Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms 2: Performance Test
    Kim, Joong Hoon
    Choi, Young Hwan
    Ngo, Thi Thuy
    Choi, Jiho
    Lee, Ho Min
    Choo, Yeon Moon
    Lee, Eui Hoon
    Yoo, Do Guen
    Sadollah, Ali
    Jung, Donghwi
    HARMONY SEARCH ALGORITHM, 2016, 382 : 207 - 213
  • [8] A Review on Metaheuristic Algorithms: Recent Trends, Benchmarking and Applications
    Wong, W. K.
    Ming, Chew Ing
    2019 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART COMPUTING & COMMUNICATIONS (ICSCC), 2019, : 330 - 334
  • [9] Benchmarking the task scheduling algorithms for performance, energy, and temperature optimization
    Ahmad, Ishfaq
    Sheikh, Hafiz Fahad
    Aved, Alex
    SUSTAINABLE COMPUTING-INFORMATICS & SYSTEMS, 2020, 25
  • [10] Stochastic Modeling and Performance Optimization of Marine Power Plant with Metaheuristic Algorithms
    Saini, Monika
    Patel, Bhavan Lal
    Kumar, Ashish
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND APPLICATION, 2023, 22 (04) : 751 - 761