The role of state breastfeeding laws and programs on exclusive breastfeeding practice among mothers in the special supplemental nutrition program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)

被引:1
作者
Apanga, Paschal A. [1 ]
Christiansen, Elizabeth J. [1 ]
Weber, Ann M. [1 ]
Darrow, Lyndsey A. [1 ]
Riddle, Mark S. [2 ]
Tung, Wei-Chen [3 ]
Liu, Yan [1 ]
Kohnen, Taya [1 ]
Garn, Joshua V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Sch Publ Hlth, 1664 N Virginia St,SMS suite 102, Reno, NV 89557 USA
[2] Univ Nevada, Sch Med, 1664 N Virginia St, Reno, NV 89557 USA
[3] San Jose State Univ, Valley Fdn, Sch Nursing, 1 Washington Sq, San Jose, CA 95192 USA
关键词
Breastfeeding; Exclusive breastfeeding; Laws; Women; Infants; Children; Effect modification; MATERNITY LEAVE; SUPPORT; TIME; ASSOCIATION; INITIATION; DURATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s13006-022-00490-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background It is unclear if state laws supporting breastfeeding are associated with exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) practice among low-income mothers participating in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). The main objectives of our study were to assess the relationship between such laws and EBF among WIC-participating mothers and to assess whether this association varied by employment status. We also assessed how mother's exposure to WIC breastfeeding consultation was associated with EBF. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted across seven WIC program locations (i.e., Georgia, Massachusetts, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Wyoming, Chickasaw Nation) between July-August 2020. Data were collected using convenient sampling from each program location and surveys were administered electronically or on paper to WIC-participating mothers. We restricted our analysis to data from 1161 WIC-participating mothers with infants aged zero to five months old. Multivariable mixed models were used to estimate the relationship between our exposures of interest (i.e., number of laws supporting breastfeeding, employment-related breastfeeding laws, WIC breastfeeding consultation) and EBF, while controlling for potential confounders and accounting for clustering by program location. Effect modification by employment status was assessed on the additive and multiplicative scales. Results Among WIC-participating mothers living in program locations with no employment-related breastfeeding laws, EBF was 26% less prevalent for employed mothers compared to unemployed mothers (adjusted prevalence ratios [aPR]: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.67,0.83). Among all mothers, a one-unit increase in laws supporting breastfeeding was not associated with EBF (aPR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.71,1.10). However, among employed mothers, living in areas with more employment-related laws was associated with a higher prevalence of EBF (aPR: 1.43, 95% CI: 0.83, 2.44). Infants whose mothers received a WIC breastfeeding consultation had 33% higher prevalence of being exclusively breastfed compared to infants whose mothers did not receive a WIC breastfeeding consultation (aPR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.05,1.70). Conclusions Infants whose WIC-participating mothers were employed, were less likely to be exclusively breastfed, but our effect modification analyses showed that laws supporting breastfeeding at the workplace may promote EBF among employed women. EBF was more prevalent among mothers who received a WIC breastfeeding consultation compared to those who did not receive such a consultation.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [11] Breastfeeding Duration Is Associated With WIC Site-Level Breastfeeding Support Practices
    Gleason, Stacy
    Wilkin, Margaret K.
    Sallack, Linnea
    Whaley, Shannon E.
    Martinez, Catherine
    Paolicelli, Courtney
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR, 2020, 52 (07) : 680 - 687
  • [12] Hamad R, 2019, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V109, P164, DOI [10.2105/ajph.2018.304693, 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304693]
  • [13] Integrating motherhood and employment: A 22-year analysis investigating impacts of US workplace breastfeeding policy
    Hauck, Katharina
    Miraldo, Marisa
    Singh, Surya
    [J]. SSM-POPULATION HEALTH, 2020, 11
  • [14] Do state breastfeeding laws in the USA promote breast feeding?
    Hawkins, Summer Sherburne
    Stern, Ariel Dora
    Gillman, Matthew W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2013, 67 (03) : 250 - 256
  • [15] Breast-feeding initiation in low-income women: Role of attitudes, support, and perceived control
    Khoury, AJ
    Moazzem, SW
    Jarjoura, CM
    Carothers, C
    Hinton, A
    [J]. WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2005, 15 (02) : 64 - 72
  • [16] Recommendations for presenting analyses of effect modification and interaction
    Knol, Mirjam J.
    VanderWeele, Tyler J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 41 (02) : 514 - 520
  • [17] Estimating measures of interaction on an additive scale for preventive exposures
    Knol, Mirjam J.
    VanderWeele, Tyler J.
    Groenwold, Rolf H. H.
    Klungel, Olaf H.
    Rovers, Maroeska M.
    Grobbee, Diederick E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 26 (06) : 433 - 438
  • [18] Multivariate analysis of state variation in breastfeeding rates in the United States
    Kogan, Michael D.
    Singh, Gopal K.
    Dee, Deborah L.
    Belanoff, Candice
    Grummer-Strawn, Laurence M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 98 (10) : 1872 - 1880
  • [19] Access to Workplace Accommodations to Support Breastfeeding after Passage of the Affordable Care Act
    Kozhimannil, Katy B.
    Jou, Judy
    Gjerdingen, Dwenda K.
    McGovern, Patricia M.
    [J]. WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2016, 26 (01) : 6 - 13
  • [20] Breastfeeding and the risk for diarrhea morbidity and mortality
    Lamberti, Laura M.
    Walker, Christa L. Fischer
    Noiman, Adi
    Victora, Cesar
    Black, Robert E.
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 11