'You Wouldn't have Your Granny Using Them': Drawing Boundaries Between Acceptable and Unacceptable Applications of Civil Drones

被引:54
作者
Boucher, Philip [1 ]
机构
[1] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Foresight & Behav Insights Unit, 21 Rue Champ de Mars, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
RPAS; UAV; Drones; Civil drones; Focus groups;
D O I
10.1007/s11948-015-9720-7
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Some industry and policy actors are concerned about public opposition to civil drones, in particular because of their association with military drones. However, very little is understood about public reactions to the technology. Strategies to 'manage public acceptance' have so far relied upon several untested assumptions. We conducted public engagement activities to explore citizens' visions of civil drones. Several insights counteracted the prevailing assumptions. Rejecting the notion of blanket support for or opposition to civil drones, we found that citizens make nuanced decisions about the acceptability of civil drones depending upon the purpose of the flight and the actors involved. The results are positioned in support for calls to strengthen the role of citizens in civil drone development and, in particular, to shift away from the current focus on citizens' acceptance of civil drone development towards the development of civil drones that are acceptable to citizens.
引用
收藏
页码:1391 / 1418
页数:28
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Amazon, 2014, AM PRIM AIR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, J RESPONSIBLE INNOV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ROADM INT CIV REM PI
[4]  
Billitteri T., 2010, CQ RES, V20, P653
[5]  
Boucher P., 2014, JRC91671
[6]   Domesticating the Drone: The Demilitarisation of Unmanned Aircraft for Civil Markets [J].
Boucher, Philip .
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2015, 21 (06) :1393-1412
[7]  
Bracken-Roche C., 2014, Surveillance Drones: Privacy Implications of the Spread of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in Canada A Report to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, under the 2013-2014 Contributions Program
[8]  
European Commision, 2013, OPT STRENGTH RESP RE
[9]  
European Commission, 2012, EUR STRAT DEV CIV AP
[10]  
European Commission, 2014, COM2014207 EUR COMM