Improving the Clarity of the Interprofessional Field: Implications for Research and Continuing Interprofessional Education

被引：37

作者：

Goldman, Joanne ^{[1
]}

Zwarenstein, Merrick ^{[2
,3
]}

Bhattacharyya, Onil ^{[4
]}

Reeves, Scott ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Toronto, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Off Continuing Educ & Profess Dev, Keenan Res Ctr,St Michaels Hosp, Toronto, ON M5B 1X2, Canada

[2] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada

[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON M5B 1X2, Canada

[4] Univ Toronto, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Dept Family & Community Med, Keenan Res Ctr,St Michaels Hosp, Toronto, ON M5B 1X2, Canada

[5] Univ Toronto, Ctr Fac Dev, St Michaels Hosp, Wilson Ctr Res Educ,Dept Psychiat, Toronto, ON M5B 1X2, Canada

来源：

JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS | 2009年 / 29卷 / 03期

基金：

加拿大健康研究院;

关键词：

interprofessional education; interprofessional collaboration; education; continuing interprofessional education; scoping review; CARE TEAMS; TEAMWORKING; HEALTH;

D O I：

10.1002/chp.20028

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

Significant investments are being made around the world to improve interprofessional collaboration, yet limits in our knowledge of this field restrict the ability of decision makers to base their decisions upon evidence. Clarity of the interprofessional field is blurred by a conceptual and semantic confusion that affects our understanding of key elements of education and practice activities, their interlinked relationship, and their effects on health or system outcomes. Systematic reviews of interprofessional education (IPE) and interprofessional collaboration (IPC) have provided some insight into the nature and effectiveness of this field, but a lack of clarity remains. In this article we report on a scoping review currently being undertaken to analyze the interprofessional field, improve its conceptual clarity, and identify elements needed to enhance its development. Emerging review findings regarding participants and settings, interventions, and outcomes are reported. The article provides implications from this review and discusses them in relation to continuing IPE and future research.

引用

页码：151 / 156

页数：6

共 25 条

[11] HALLIN K, 2008, MED TEACH, V20, P1
[12] A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME Guide no. 9
Hammick, M.
Freeth, D.
Koppel, I.
Reeves, S.
Barr, H.
[J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2007, 29 (08) : 735 - 751
[13] Leathard A., 1994, GOING INTERPROFESSIO
[14] Leathard A., 2003, Interprofessional collaboration: From policy to practice in health and social care, V1
[15] *ONT MIN HLTH LONG, FAM HLTH TEAMS NURS
[16] From students to professionals: Results of a longitudinal study of attitudes to pre-qualifying collaborative learning and working in health and social care in the United Kingdom
Pollard, Katherine C.
Miers, Margaret E.
[J]. JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2008, 22 (04) : 399 - 416
[17] Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes
Reeves, S.
Zwarenstein, M.
Goldman, J.
Barr, H.
Freeth, D.
Hammick, M.
Koppel, I
[J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2008, (01):
[18] Reeves S., SCOPING REV IDENTIFY
[19] *UK DEP HLTH, DEL PRIM CAR
[20] Health Care Improvement and Continuing Interprofessional Education: Continuing Interprofessional Development to Improve Patient Outcomes
Wilcock, Peter M.
Janes, Gillian
Chambers, Alison
[J]. JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2009, 29 (02) : 84 - 90

← 1 2 3 →