On cognitive management and non-causal reasoning for enabling highly automated driving

被引:0
作者
Panagiotopoulos, Ilias E. [1 ]
Karathanasopoulou, Konstantina N. [1 ]
Dimitrakopoulos, George J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harokopio Univ Athens, Dept Informat & Telemat, Athens, Greece
来源
2021 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (CSCI 2021) | 2021年
关键词
highly automated driving; cognitive computing; hybrid intelligence; level of autonomy prediction; non-causal reasoning; INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1109/CSCI54926.2021.00350
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Highly Automated Vehicles (HAVs) have become a trend, and also a hotspot of research in recent years, aiming to support, or even to replace, human drivers. Their goal is mainly to strengthen the driver's sensing ability and to reduce the control efforts of the vehicle itself. Moreover, on-board communications equipment helps vehicles to have a model of their complex driving environment that includes the presence (meta-knowledge) of other entities sharing the same driving scene. Therefore, cognitive decisions should be taken in an automated manner, being able to operate HAVs each time in the best available Level of Autonomy (LoA), by responding quickly not only to causal reasoning effects, which depend on present and past inputs from the external driving environment, but also to non-causal reasoning situations, which depend on future states associated with the external driving scene. The present study aims to tackle exactly this challenge by introducing an on-board cognitive decision-making functionality, which operates on the basis of collecting information from various sources, intelligently processing it, integrating knowledge and experience and, finally, selecting the optimal LoA.
引用
收藏
页码:1856 / 1861
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2021, SAE Standard J3016, DOI DOI 10.4271/J3016202104
[2]   Is partially automated driving a bad idea? Observations from an on-road study [J].
Banks, Victoria A. ;
Eriksson, Alexander ;
O'Donoghue, Jim ;
Stanton, Neville A. .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2018, 68 :138-145
[3]   The role of system description for conditionally automated vehicles [J].
Bloemacher, Katja ;
Noecker, Gerhard ;
Huff, Markus .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2018, 54 :159-170
[4]  
Desai S.., 2017, INT J COMPUT SCI MOB, V6, P46
[5]   Proactive, knowledge-based intelligent transportation system based on vehicular sensor networks [J].
Dimitrakopoulos, George ;
Bravos, George ;
Nikolaidou, Mara ;
Anagnostopoulos, Dimosthenis .
IET INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, 2013, 7 (04) :454-463
[6]   Intelligent Management Functionality for Improving Transportation Efficiency by Means of the Car Pooling Concept [J].
Dimitrakopoulos, George ;
Demestichas, Panagiotis ;
Koutra, Vera .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2012, 13 (02) :424-436
[7]   INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS [J].
Dimitrakopoulos, George ;
Demestichas, Panagiotis .
IEEE VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY MAGAZINE, 2010, 5 (01) :77-84
[8]  
Felemban Emad., 2014, Journal of Transportation Technologies, V4, P196, DOI [DOI 10.4236/jtts.2014.43020, 10.4236/jtts.2014.43020, DOI 10.4236/JTTS.2014.43020]
[9]   User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles [J].
Haboucha, Chana J. ;
Ishaq, Robert ;
Shiftan, Yoram .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2017, 78 :37-49
[10]   Intelligent Transportation System with Diverse Semi-Autonomous Vehicles [J].
Kala, Rahul ;
Warwick, Kevin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2015, 8 (05) :886-899