Considerations for Assessment and Applicability of Studies of Intervention

被引：0

作者：

Gil, Alexandra B. ^{[1
]}

Piva, Sara R. ^{[1
]}

Irrgang, James J. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Phys Therapy, Bridgeside Point 1,100 Technol Dr,Suite 210, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 USA

来源：

CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE | 2018年 / 37卷 / 03期

关键词：

Evidence-based practice; Hierarchy of evidence; Quality of evidence; Applicability of evidence; Evidence-based medicine; Levels of evidence; ARTHROSCOPIC SURGERY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; USERS GUIDES; QUALITY; PART; TOOL; REHABILITATION; RANDOMIZATION; QUESTIONS;

D O I：

10.1016/j.csm.2018.03.008

中图分类号：

G8 [体育];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0403 ;

摘要：

Evidence-based practice changed how health care professionals are taught medical practice. Despite all best intentions, many health care professionals have limited knowledge to assess the validity and usefulness of the medical literature. This article reviews the following basic considerations while appraising studies of intervention: (1) the hierarchy of evidence and the strengths and weaknesses of clinical studies, (2) the relevant elements of study design that affect the validity of study results, and (3) the spectrum of efficacy and effectiveness of clinical studies and how these influence the applicability of study results to individual patients.

引用

页码：427 / +

页数：15

共 50 条

[31] Recommendations for outcome measurement for deprescribing intervention studies
Bayliss, Elizabeth A.
Albers, Kathleen
Gleason, Kathy
Pieper, Lisa E.
Boyd, Cynthia M.
Campbell, Noll L.
Ensrud, Kristine E.
Gray, Shelly L.
Linsky, Amy M.
Mangin, Derelie
Min, Lillian
Rich, Michael W.
Steinman, Michael A.
Turner, Justin
Vasilevskis, Eduard E.
Dublin, Sascha
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2022, 70 (09) : 2487 - 2497
[32] Improving management of type 2 diabetes in South Asian patients: a systematic review of intervention studies
Bhurji, N.
Javer, J.
Gasevic, D.
Khan, N. A.
BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (04):
[33] Assessment of upper limb in tetraplegia: Considerations in evaluation and outcomes research
Mulcahey, M. J.
Hutchinson, Dave
Kozin, Scott
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 44 (01) : 91 - 101
[34] Considerations that will determine if competency-based assessment is a sustainable innovation
Dauphinee, W. Dale
Boulet, John R.
Norcini, John J.
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2019, 24 (02) : 413 - 421
[35] Anosognosia for Prospective and Retrospective Memory Deficits: Assessment and Theoretical Considerations
Chapman, Silvia
Beschin, Nicoletta
Cosentino, Stephanie
Elkind, Mitchell S., V
Della Sala, Sergio
Cocchini, Gianna
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 33 (07) : 1020 - 1031
[36] Probabilistic risk assessment of the effects of fire service intervention on structural fire resistance design of unsprinklered buildings
Inerhunwa, Iziengbe
Wang, Yong
Su, Meini
FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 2021, 124
[37] Rapid nutritional assessment and intervention in orthopedic rehabilitation patients
Niyati, Saeed
Sajwani, Zara
Daniel, Kathryn M.
GERIATRIC NURSING, 2021, 42 (01) : 283 - 288
[38] Group and partnered dance for people living with dementia: an overview of intervention design and measurement considerations
Jehu, Deborah A.
Bek, Judith
Bennett, Crystal
Hackney, Madeleine E.
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, 16
[39] Design Considerations for Virtual Reality Intervention for People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Systematic Review
Yi, Ye Ji
Heidari Matin, Negar
Brannan, Darin
Johnson, Michael
Nguyen, Anna
HERD-HEALTH ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH & DESIGN JOURNAL, 2024, 17 (04) : 212 - 241
[40] Research considerations for prospective studies of patients with coma and disorders of consciousness
Tinti, Lorenzo
Lawson, Thomas
Molteni, Erika
Kondziella, Daniel
Rass, Verena
Sharshar, Tarek
Bodien, Yelena G.
Giacino, Joseph T.
Mayer, Stephan A.
Amiri, Moshgan
Muehlschlegel, Susanne
Rao, Chethan P. Venkatasubba
Vespa, Paul M.
Menon, David K.
Citerio, Giuseppe
Helbok, Raimund
McNett, Molly
BRAIN COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 6 (01)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →