Considerations for Assessment and Applicability of Studies of Intervention

被引：0
|
作者：
Gil, Alexandra B. [1 ]
Piva, Sara R. [1 ]
Irrgang, James J. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Phys Therapy, Bridgeside Point 1,100 Technol Dr,Suite 210, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 USA
来源：
CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE | 2018年 / 37卷 / 03期
关键词：
Evidence-based practice; Hierarchy of evidence; Quality of evidence; Applicability of evidence; Evidence-based medicine; Levels of evidence; ARTHROSCOPIC SURGERY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; USERS GUIDES; QUALITY; PART; TOOL; REHABILITATION; RANDOMIZATION; QUESTIONS;
D O I：
10.1016/j.csm.2018.03.008
中图分类号：
G8 [体育];
学科分类号：
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要：
Evidence-based practice changed how health care professionals are taught medical practice. Despite all best intentions, many health care professionals have limited knowledge to assess the validity and usefulness of the medical literature. This article reviews the following basic considerations while appraising studies of intervention: (1) the hierarchy of evidence and the strengths and weaknesses of clinical studies, (2) the relevant elements of study design that affect the validity of study results, and (3) the spectrum of efficacy and effectiveness of clinical studies and how these influence the applicability of study results to individual patients.
引用
收藏
页码：427 / +
页数：15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Assessment of Intervention Fidelity in Published Social Work Intervention Research Studies
    Corley, Nicole A.
    Kim, Irang
    RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2016, 26 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [2] Appraising clinical applicability of studies: mapping and synthesis of current frameworks, and proposal of the FrACAS framework and VICORT checklist
    Quoc Dinh Nguyen
    Moodie, Erica M.
    Desmarais, Philippe
    Goulden, Robert
    Forget, Marie-France
    Peters, Eric
    Saeed, Sahar
    Keezer, Mark R.
    Wolfson, Christina
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [3] Design considerations in long-term intervention studies for the prevention of cognitive decline or dementia
    Dangour, Alan D.
    Allen, Elizabeth
    Richards, Marcus
    Whitehouse, Peter
    Uauy, Ricardo
    NUTRITION REVIEWS, 2010, 68 (11) : S16 - S21
  • [4] Negative mechanistic reasoning in medical intervention assessment
    Jesper Jerkert
    Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 2015, 36 : 425 - 437
  • [5] Negative mechanistic reasoning in medical intervention assessment
    Jerkert, Jesper
    THEORETICAL MEDICINE AND BIOETHICS, 2015, 36 (06) : 425 - 437
  • [6] Methodological Considerations in Evaluating Breast Cancer Screening Studies
    Narayan, Anand K.
    Miles, Randy C.
    Woods, Ryan W.
    Spalluto, Lucy B.
    Burnside, Elizabeth S.
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2024, 6 (06) : 577 - 585
  • [7] Applicability of ptilochronology as a conservation tool in waterbird studies
    Clarkson, Charles E.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2011, 11 (06) : 1707 - 1709
  • [8] Statistical considerations for preclinical studies
    Aban, Inmaculada B.
    George, Brandon
    EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 2015, 270 : 82 - 87
  • [9] Assessment of the Risk of Bias in controlled Studies
    Buchberger, B.
    von Elm, E.
    Gartlehner, G.
    Huppertz, H.
    Antes, G.
    Wasem, J.
    Meerpohl, J. J.
    BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ, 2014, 57 (12) : 1432 - 1438
  • [10] Evaluation of Sham-CPAP as a Placebo in CPAP Intervention Studies
    Rodway, George W.
    Weaver, Terri E.
    Mancini, Cristina
    Cater, Jacqueline
    Maislin, Greg
    Staley, Bethany
    Ferguson, Kathleen A.
    George, Charles F. P.
    Schulman, David A.
    Greenberg, Harly
    Rapoport, David M.
    Walsleben, Joyce A.
    Lee-Chiong, Teofilo
    Kuna, Samuel T.
    SLEEP, 2010, 33 (02) : 260 - 266
12345