Effect of thermocycling on the retention of glass-fiber root canal posts

被引:0
作者
Purton, DG
Chandler, NP
Qualtrough, AJE
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Sch Dent, Dept Oral Rehabil, Dunedin, New Zealand
[2] Univ Manchester, Dent Hosp, Manchester, Lancs, England
来源
QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL | 2003年 / 34卷 / 05期
关键词
glass fiber; resin; retention; root canal post; thermocycle;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: This study investigated the effects of thermocycling on the retention of glass-fiber and resin posts. Method and materials: Forty premolar and canine tooth roots were embedded in acrylic blocks shaped to fit into a retention device. The roots were randomly assigned to two groups of 20 to receive either Lightposts or Luscent Anchors which were cemented into 9-mm-deep post spaces, with Panavia F resin cement. Each group was randomly divided into two equal subgroups: one for thermocycling, and the other to serve as a control. The thermocycled specimens were cycled 3,000 times between water baths at 5degreesC and 55degreesC, with a dwell time of 60 seconds in each. Control specimens were stored at 37degreesC. The tensile force required to dislodge each post from its root was recorded and the data analyzed using Student's t tests. Results: There were no significant differences in the forces required to cause post-retention failure between the control and thermocycled specimens. Lightposts were significantly more retentive than Luscent Anchors without thermocycling, but this distinction was not apparent in the thermocycled groups. Conclusion: Glass-fiber and resin posts cemented with resin cement offer acceptable levels of retention and are not susceptible to reduced retention from thermocycling. Thermocycling should be given less emphasis in tests for the retention of root canal posts cemented with resin cements.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 369
页数:4
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Drummond J L, 2000, Am J Dent, V13, p5B
[2]   Thermal and cyclic loading of endodontic posts [J].
Drummond, JL ;
Toepke, TRS ;
King, TJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 1999, 107 (03) :220-224
[3]  
Hew YS, 2001, J ORAL REHABIL, V28, P207
[4]  
*INT ORG STAND, 1994, DENT MAT GUID TEST A
[5]   A CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF FIXED BRIDGES, 10 YEARS FOLLOWING INSERTION [J].
KARLSSON, S .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1986, 13 (05) :423-432
[6]   Meta-analytical review of factors involved in dentin adherence [J].
Leloup, G ;
D'Hoore, W ;
Bouter, D ;
Degrange, M ;
Vreven, J .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 80 (07) :1605-1614
[7]   Retention of posts with resin, glass ionomer and hybrid cements [J].
Love, RM ;
Purton, DG .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1998, 26 (07) :599-602
[8]   Rigidity and retention of root canal posts [J].
Purton, DG ;
Chandler, NP ;
Love, RM .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1998, 184 (06) :294-296
[9]   DISTRIBUTION OF CORROSION PRODUCTS IN TEETH RESTORED WITH METAL CROWNS RETAINED BY STAINLESS-STEEL POSTS [J].
SILNESS, J ;
GUSTAVSEN, F ;
HUNSBETH, J .
ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1979, 37 (06) :317-321