Breast cancer screening in BRCA1 mutation carriers:: Effectiveness of MR imaging -: Markov Monte Carlo decision analysis

被引:33
作者
Lee, Janie M. [1 ,2 ]
Kopans, Daniel B. [1 ]
McMahon, Pamela M. [1 ,2 ]
Halpern, Elkan F. [1 ,2 ]
Ryan, Paula D. [3 ]
Weinstein, Milton C. [4 ]
Gazelle, G. Scott [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Inst Technol Assessment, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Hematol Oncol, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2463070224
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To project, intermediate and long-terrn clinical outcomes of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging screening for breast cancer in women with BRCA1 gene mutations. Materials and Methods: A microsimulation model was developed to compare three annual screening strategies versus clinical surveillance: (a) mammography, (b) MR imaging, and (c) combined MR imaging and mammography. Input parameters were obtained from the published medical literature, existing databases, and expert opinion. The model was calibrated to targets from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database (1975-1980) compiled during a period prior to the onset. of widespread mammographic screening. Sensitivity analysis Was Performed to evaluate the effect of uncertainty in parameter estimates. Results: With clinical surveillance, the estimated median diameter of invasive breast cancers at presentation was 2.6 cm. Average lire expectancy was 71.15 years. With annual screening with mammography, MR imaging, or combined mammography and MR imaging, median invasive tumor diameters at. diagnosis decreased to 1.9, 1.3, and 1.1 cm, respectively. Annual screening with mammography, MR imaging, or combined mammography and MR imaging increased average lire expectancy by 0.80 year, 1.10 years, and 1.38 years, respectively, and decreased relative mortality from breast cancer (16.8%, 17.2%, and 22.0%, respectively). Program sensitivity was greater than 50% only with MR imaging screening strategies. The majority or women undergoing screening had one or more, false-positive screening examinations (53.8%, 80.2%, and 84.0% for mammography, ME imaging, and combined mammography and MR imaging, respectively). Many women also underwent one or more biopsies for benign disease (11.3%, 26.3%, and 30.3%, respectively). Results were sensitive to BRCA1 penetrance estimates and to MR imaging sensitivity in the detection of ductal carcinoma in Situ. Conclusion: Annual screening with combined mammography and MR imaging provides BRCA1 mutation carriers with the greatest life expectancy gain and breast cancer mortality reduction. However, an important: trade-off or this strategy is an increased rate of False-positive screening results and biopsies performed for benign disease.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 771
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V365, P1687, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[2]  
Allred DC, 2002, BREAST CANCER RES TR, V76, pS36
[3]  
*AM CANC SOC, 2006, BREAST CANC FACTS 20
[4]   Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history:: A combined analysis of 22 studies [J].
Antoniou, A ;
Pharoah, PDP ;
Narod, S ;
Risch, HA ;
Eyfjord, JE ;
Hopper, JL ;
Loman, N ;
Olsson, H ;
Johannsson, O ;
Borg, Å ;
Pasini, B ;
Radice, P ;
Manoukian, S ;
Eccles, DM ;
Tang, N ;
Olah, E ;
Anton-Culver, H ;
Warner, E ;
Lubinski, J ;
Gronwald, J ;
Gorski, B ;
Tulinius, H ;
Thorlacius, S ;
Eerola, H ;
Nevanlinna, H ;
Syrjäkoski, K ;
Kallioniemi, OP ;
Thompson, D ;
Evans, C ;
Peto, J ;
Lalloo, F ;
Evans, DG ;
Easton, DF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 72 (05) :1117-1130
[5]  
ARINS E, 2004, US LIFE TABLES 2001, P1
[6]  
*BREAST CANC SURV, FREQ NOD POS MET CAN
[7]   Effectiveness of breast cancer surveillance in BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and women with high familial risk [J].
Brekelmans, CTM ;
Seynaeve, C ;
Bartels, CCM ;
Tilanus-Linthorst, MMA ;
Meijers-Heijboer, EJ ;
Crepin, CMG ;
van Geel, AN ;
Menke, M ;
Verhoog, LC ;
van den Ouweland, A ;
Obdeijn, IM ;
Klijn, JGM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (04) :924-930
[8]   Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer .2. BRCA1 and BRCA2 [J].
Burke, W ;
Daly, M ;
Garber, J ;
Botkin, J ;
Kahn, MJE ;
Lynch, P ;
McTierman, A ;
Offit, K ;
Perlman, J ;
Petersen, G ;
Thomson, E ;
Varricchio, C .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (12) :997-1003
[9]   Medical progress - Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast [J].
Burstein, HJ ;
Polyak, K ;
Wong, JS ;
Lester, SC ;
Kaelin, CM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (14) :1430-1441
[10]  
DALY MB, 2004, NATL COMPREHENSIVE C