Virtual machines pre-copy live migration cost modeling and prediction: a survey

被引:10
作者
Elsaid, Mohamed Esam [1 ]
Abbas, Hazem M. [2 ]
Meinel, Christoph [1 ]
机构
[1] Hasso Plattner Inst, Prof Dr Helmert Str 2-3, D-14482 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Engn, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Virtual datacenter; Cloud computing; Live migration; Overhead; Cost; Modelling; Prediction;
D O I
10.1007/s10619-021-07387-2
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Live migration is an essential feature in virtual infrastructure and cloud computing datacenters. Using live migration, virtual machines can be online migrated from a physical machine to another with negligible service interruption. Load balance, power saving, dynamic resource allocation, and high availability algorithms in virtual data-centers and cloud computing environments are dependent on live migration. Live migration process has six phases that result in live migration cost. Several papers analyze and model live migration costs for different hypervisors, different kinds of workloads and different models of analysis. In addition, there are also many other papers that provide prediction techniques for live migration costs. It is a challenge for the reader to organize, classify, and compare live migration overhead research papers due to the broad focus of the papers in this domain. In this survey paper, we classify, analyze, and compare different papers that cover pre-copy live migration cost analysis and prediction from different angels to show the contributions and the drawbacks of each study. Papers classification helps the readers to get different studies details about a specific live migration cost parameter. The classification of the paper considers the papers' research focus, methodology, the hypervisors, and the cost parameters. Papers analysis helps the readers to know which model can be used for which hypervisor and to know the techniques used for live migration cost analysis and prediction. Papers comparison shows the contributions, drawbacks, and the modeling differences by each paper in a table format that simplifies the comparison. Virtualized Data-center and cloud computing clusters admins can also make use of this paper to know which live migration cost prediction model can fit for their environments.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 474
页数:34
相关论文
共 53 条
[31]   Markov Prediction Model for Host Load Detection and VM Placement in Live Migration [J].
Melhem, Suhib Bani ;
Agarwal, Anjali ;
Goel, Nishith ;
Zaman, Marzia .
IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 :7190-7205
[32]   A Markov-based Prediction Model for Host Load Detection in Live VM Migration [J].
Melhem, Suhib Bani ;
Agarwal, Anjali ;
Goel, Nishith ;
Zaman, Marzia .
2017 IEEE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE INTERNET OF THINGS AND CLOUD (FICLOUD 2017), 2017, :32-38
[33]   Optimization of live virtual machine migration in cloud computing: A survey and future directions [J].
Noshy, Mostafa ;
Ibrahim, Abdelhameed ;
Ali, Hesham Arafat .
JOURNAL OF NETWORK AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, 2018, 110 :1-10
[34]  
Patel M, 2014, 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PARALLEL, DISTRIBUTED AND GRID COMPUTING (PDGC), P445, DOI 10.1109/PDGC.2014.7030787
[35]  
Qiang Huang, 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 Third International Conference on Communications and Mobile Computing (CMC 2011), P122, DOI 10.1109/CMC.2011.62
[36]   Prediction-based dynamic resource scheduling for virtualized cloud systems [J].
Huang, Qingjia ;
Shuang, Kai ;
Xu, Peng ;
Li, Jian ;
Liu, Xu ;
Su, Sen .
Journal of Networks, 2014, 9 (02) :375-383
[37]  
Rybina K, 2016, INT BLACK SEA CONF
[38]  
Sahni S., 2012, P 2012 IEEE INT C CL, P1
[39]  
Salfner F, 2011, PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DEPENDABILITY (DEPEND 2011), P100
[40]  
Shi B, 2019, IEEE INFOCOM SER, P334, DOI [10.1109/INFOCOM.2019.8737639, 10.1109/infocom.2019.8737639]