A multivariate method for meta-analysis and comparison of diagnostic tests

被引:17
作者
Dimou, Niki L. [1 ]
Adam, Maria [1 ]
Bagos, Pantelis G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Thessaly, Dept Comp Sci & Biomed Informat, Papasiopoulou 2-4, Lamia 35100, Greece
关键词
meta-analysis; diagnostic tests; SROC method; ODDS RATIO; DISEASE PREVALENCE; TEST ACCURACY; SPECIFICITY; SENSITIVITY; MODELS; CURVE; UNIFICATION; DEPENDENCE; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1002/sim.6919
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We present here an extension of the classic bivariate random effects meta-analysis for the log-transformed sensitivity and specificity that can be applied for two or more diagnostic tests. The advantage of this method is that a closed-form expression is derived for the calculation of the within-studies covariances. The method allows the direct calculation of sensitivity and specificity, as well as, the diagnostic odds ratio, the area under curve and the parameters of the summary receiver operator's characteristic curve, along with the means for a formal comparison of these quantities for different tests. There is no need for individual patient data or the simultaneous evaluation of both diagnostic tests in all studies. The method is simple and fast; it can be extended for several diagnostic tests and can be fitted in nearly all statistical packages. The method was evaluated in simulations and applied in a meta-analysis for the comparison of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody and rheumatoid factor for discriminating patients with rheumatoid arthritis, with encouraging results. Simulations suggest that the method is robust and more powerful compared with the standard bivariate approach that ignores the correlation between tests. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:3509 / 3523
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
[51]   Repeated-measures modeling improved comparison of diagnostic tests in meta-analysis of dependent studies [J].
Siadaty, MS ;
Philbrick, JT ;
Heim, SW ;
Schectman, JM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 57 (07) :698-711
[52]  
Stevens J., 1986, APPL MULTIVARIATE ST
[53]   The conditional relative odds ratio provided less biased results for comparing diagnostic test accuracy in meta-analyses [J].
Suzuki, S ;
Moro-oka, T ;
Choudhry, NK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 57 (05) :461-469
[55]  
Thompson SG, 1999, STAT MED, V18, P2693, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19991030)18:20<2693::AID-SIM235>3.0.CO
[56]  
2-V
[57]   Methods for the joint meta-analysis of multiple tests [J].
Trikalinos, Thomas A. ;
Hoaglin, David C. ;
Small, Kevin M. ;
Terrin, Norma ;
Schmid, Christopher H. .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2014, 5 (04) :294-312
[58]   Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression [J].
van Houwelingen, HC ;
Arends, LR ;
Stijnen, T .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (04) :589-624
[59]   Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data [J].
Walter, SD .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (09) :1237-1256
[60]   Multivariate random-effects meta-analysis [J].
White, Ian R. .
STATA JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (01) :40-56