Political economy of taxation in an overlapping-generations economy

被引:28
作者
Bassetto, Marco [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fed Reserve Bank Chicago, Chicago, IL 60604 USA
[2] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
social security; bargaining; distortionary taxes;
D O I
10.1016/j.red.2007.06.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes the effects of intergenerational conflict on capital and labor income tax rates, transfers, and government spending in a model of multidimensional policy choice. The different nature of tax liabilities for the young and the old can explain why the old receive large gross lump-sum transfers through social security, while the young receive little or none. A natural link also emerges between the size of the government as a provider of public goods and the magnitude of transfers that the same government will implement. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 43
页数:26
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ADV EC ANAL POLICY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, EUR J POLIT ECON, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0176-2680(01)00066-0
[3]   GENERATIONAL ACCOUNTING - A MEANINGFUL WAY TO EVALUATE FISCAL-POLICY [J].
AUERBACH, AJ ;
GOKHALE, J ;
KOTLIKOFF, LJ .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1994, 8 (01) :73-94
[4]  
Bassetto M., 1999, 133 FED RES BANK MIN
[5]   THE NASH BARGAINING SOLUTION IN ECONOMIC MODELING [J].
BINMORE, K ;
RUBINSTEIN, A ;
WOLINSKY, A .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1986, 17 (02) :176-188
[6]   The intergenerational state education and pensions [J].
Boldrin, M ;
Montes, A .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2005, 72 (03) :651-664
[7]   Positive arithmetic of the welfare state [J].
Conde-Ruiz, JI ;
Galasso, V .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2005, 89 (5-6) :933-955
[8]   A positive theory of social security based on reputation [J].
Cooley, TF ;
Soares, J .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1999, 107 (01) :135-160
[9]  
COOLEY TF, 1996, CARNEGIE-ROCHESTER C, V45, P88
[10]   Saving and pension reform in general equilibrium models [J].
De Nardi, M ;
Imrohoroglu, S ;
Sargent, TJ .
OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2001, 17 (01) :20-39