Heterologous protein expression in Hypocrea jecorina: A historical perspective and new developments

被引:48
作者
Singh, Arjun [1 ]
Taylor, Larry E., II [2 ]
Vander Wall, Todd A. [2 ]
Linger, Jeffrey [1 ]
Himmel, Michael E. [2 ]
Podkaminer, Kara [2 ]
Adney, William S. [2 ]
Decker, Stephen R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Natl Bioenergy Ctr, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Biosci Ctr, Golden, CO 80401 USA
关键词
Trichoderma reesei; Hypocrea jecorina; QM6a; Rut-C30; cbh1; Cel7A; Cellobiohydrolase; deletion; Fungal transformation; Cellulase expression systems; FUNGUS TRICHODERMA-REESEI; STEP GENE REPLACEMENT; BETA-GLUCOSIDASE GENE; CELLOBIOHYDROLASE-I; TRANSFORMATION SYSTEM; SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE; HORMOCONIS-RESINAE; FILAMENTOUS FUNGI; PICHIA-PASTORIS; GLUCOAMYLASE-P;
D O I
10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.11.009
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Hypocrea jecorina, the sexual teleomorph of Trichoderma reesei, has long been favored as an industrial cellulase producer, first utilizing its native cellulase system and later augmented by the introduction of heterologous enzymatic activities or improved variants of native enzymes. Expression of heterologous proteins in H. jecorina was once considered difficult when the target was an improved variant of a native cellulase. Developments over the past nearly 30 years have produced strains, vectors, and selection mechanisms that have continued to simplify and streamline heterologous protein expression in this fungus. More recent developments in fungal molecular biology have pointed the way toward a fundamental transformation in the ease and efficiency of heterologous protein expression in this important industrial host. Here, I) we provide a historical perspective on advances in H. jecorina molecular biology, 2) outline host strain engineering, transformation, selection, and expression strategies, 3) detail potential pitfalls when working with this organism, and 4) provide consolidated examples of successful cellulase expression outcomes from our laboratory. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 154
页数:13
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]   Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase II is associated with the outer membrane when overexpressed in Escherichia coli [J].
Abdeljabbar, Diya M. ;
Song, Hank J. ;
Link, A. James .
BIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERS, 2012, 34 (01) :91-96
[2]   INDUCTION, ISOLATION AND TESTING OF STABLE TRICHODERMA-REESEI MUTANTS WITH IMPROVED PRODUCTION OF SOLUBILIZING CELLULASE [J].
BAILEY, MJ ;
NEVALAINEN, KMH .
ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY, 1981, 3 (02) :153-157
[3]   Process technological effects of deletion and amplification of hydrophobins I and II in transformants of Trichoderma reesei [J].
Bailey, MJ ;
Askolin, S ;
Hörhammer, N ;
Tenkanen, M ;
Linder, M ;
Penttilä, M ;
Nakari-Setälä, T .
APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2002, 58 (06) :721-727
[4]   ISOLATION OF URIDINE AUXOTROPHS FROM TRICHODERMA-REESEI AND EFFICIENT TRANSFORMATION WITH THE CLONED URA3 AND URA5 GENES [J].
BERGES, T ;
BARREAU, C .
CURRENT GENETICS, 1991, 19 (05) :359-365
[5]   Recombinant enzymes from thermophilic micro-organisms expressed in fungal hosts [J].
Bergquist, PL ;
Te'o, VSJ ;
Gibbs, MD ;
Curach, NC ;
Nevalainen, KMH .
BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS, 2004, 32 :293-297
[6]   Expression of xylanase enzymes from thermophilic microorganisms in fungal hosts [J].
Bergqvist, P ;
Te'o, V ;
Gibbs, M ;
Cziferszky, A ;
de Faria, FP ;
Azevedo, M ;
Nevalainen, H .
EXTREMOPHILES, 2002, 6 (03) :177-184
[7]  
Boer H, 2000, BIOTECHNOL BIOENG, V69, P486, DOI 10.1002/1097-0290(20000905)69:5<486::AID-BIT3>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-N
[9]   Comparison of the Heterologous Expression of Trichoderma reesei Endoglucanase II and Cellobiohydrolase II in the Yeasts Pichia pastoris and Yarrowia lipolytica [J].
Boonvitthya, Nassapat ;
Bozonnet, Sophie ;
Burapatana, Vorakan ;
O'Donohue, Michael J. ;
Chulalaksananukul, Warawut .
MOLECULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2013, 54 (02) :158-169
[10]   Directed evolution of industrial enzymes: an update [J].
Cherry, JR ;
Fidantsef, AL .
CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2003, 14 (04) :438-443