Influence of safety climate on risk tolerance and risk-taking behavior: A cross-cultural examination

被引:23
作者
Bhandari, Siddharth [1 ]
Hallowell, Matthew R. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Res Construct Safety Res Alliance, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, 1111 Engn Dr,UCB 428, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Construct Safety Res Alliance, 1111 Engn Dr, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Construct Engn, 1111 Engn Dr, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
Safety climate; Risk tolerance; Risk-taking behavior; And individual differences; CONSTRUCTION WORKERS; HAZARD IDENTIFICATION; OCCUPATIONAL-SAFETY; MINOR ALTERATION; HONG-KONG; PERCEPTION; ATTITUDES; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105559
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Although there are growing number of studies that investigate the influence of safety climate on safety outcomes, the relationship between safety climate and individual risk-taking behavior remains unknown. This study leverages survey data from 11,811 construction workers from 19 countries to empirically validate the associations between safety climate, risk tolerance, and risk-taking decisions in the workplace using linear-mixed effects model analysis. Results showed that safety climate has a significantly negative relationship with risk tolerance. Furthermore, safety climate also has a negative relationship with risk-taking decisions, which is independent of respective risk tolerance levels. These results show that safety climate can reduce risk tolerance and promote more risk-averse decision-making at work. The consistency of these results across diverse cultures suggests that multi-national organizations can foster a consistent safety culture where operational rules are followed, and risks are avoided. Future research is suggested to validate these findings and explore how individual organizational policies and interventions influence safety climate and risk-based decision making.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 111 条
  • [1] Empirical measurement and improvement of hazard recognition skill
    Albert, Alex
    Hallowell, Matthew R.
    Skaggs, Michael
    Kleiner, Brian
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2017, 93 : 1 - 8
  • [2] Revamping Occupational Safety and Health Training: Integrating Andragogical Principles for the Adult Learner
    Albert, Alex
    Hallowel, Matthew R.
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION ECONOMICS AND BUILDING, 2013, 13 (03): : 128 - 140
  • [3] Enhancing Construction Hazard Recognition with High-Fidelity Augmented Virtuality
    Albert, Alex
    Hallowell, Matthew R.
    Kleiner, Brian
    Chen, Ao
    Golparvar-Fard, Mani
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 140 (07)
  • [4] Safety climate dimensions and their relationship to construction safety performance: A meta-analytic review
    Alruqi, Wael M.
    Hallowell, Matthew R.
    Techera, Ulises
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2018, 109 : 165 - 173
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1985, Graphical Methods for Data Analysis
  • [6] Workplace hazard identification and management: The case of an underground mining operation
    Bahn, Susanne
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2013, 57 : 129 - 137
  • [7] Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
    Bates, Douglas
    Maechler, Martin
    Bolker, Benjamin M.
    Walker, Steven C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01): : 1 - 48
  • [8] Bennett DA, 2001, AUST NZ J PUBL HEAL, V25, P464, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2001.tb00294.x
  • [9] Modeling the Relationship between Personal Risk Tolerance, Work-Related Risk Tolerance, and Risk-Taking Behavior of Construction Workers
    Bhandari, Siddharth
    Hallowell, Matthew R.
    Alruqi, Wael
    Salas, Rico
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 147 (04)
  • [10] Making construction safety training interesting: A field-based quasi experiment to test the relationship between emotional arousal and situational interest among adult learners
    Bhandari, Siddharth
    Hallowell, Matthew R.
    Correll, Joshua
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2019, 117 : 58 - 70