China's coastal seawater environment caused by urbanization based on the seawater environmental Kuznets curve

被引:15
|
作者
Wang, Zhibao [1 ]
Qi, Guangzhi [1 ]
Wei, Wendong [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Normal Univ, Coll Geog & Environm, Jinan, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Int & Publ Affairs, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, SJTU UNIDO Joint Inst Inclus & Sustainable Ind De, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, China Inst Urban Governance, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Urbanization; Seawater environment; Seawater EKC; Seawater quality; China's coastal waters; MARINE POLLUTION; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENERGY; CONSUMPTION; BOHAI; EUTROPHICATION; WATERS; AREA; MICROPLASTICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105893
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
Rapid urbanization has had many negative impacts on China's coastal waters. Based on the seawater EKC, we analyse the evolution of seawater quality in China's mainland coastal waters. We explore the specific urbanization factors affecting seawater quality in coastal waters via multiple panel regression analysis. China's coastal seawater environment is improving. The proportion of Class I and Class II seawater in China's coastal waters fluctuates while inferior Class IV seawater decreases. The proportion of good-quality seawater in China's coastal waters is mainly affected by the population urbanization rate and per capita gross domestic product (GDP). In contrast, the proportion of poor-quality seawater in China's coastal waters is mainly affected by land urbanization, non-agriculturalization, and per capita GDP. Various dimensions of urbanization have different impacts on seawater quality in China's coastal waters at middle and high urbanization levels. The population urbanization rate increases the proportion of poor-quality seawater at the moderate urbanization level and inhibits it at the high urbanization level; the land urbanization rate has reverse effects.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Testing the moderating role of urbanization on the environmental Kuznets curve: empirical evidence from an emerging market
    Kirikkaleli, Dervis
    Kalmaz, Demet Beton
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (30) : 38169 - 38180
  • [32] Is the environmental Kuznets curve related to the fishing footprint? Evidence from China
    Yilanci, Veli
    Cutcu, Ibrahim
    Cayir, Bilal
    FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2022, 254
  • [33] ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE WITH ADJUSTED NET SAVINGS AS A TRADE-OFF BETWEEN ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
    Neve, Martin
    Hamaide, Bertrand
    AUSTRALIAN ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2017, 56 (01) : 39 - 58
  • [34] Economic Activities and Management Issues for the Environment: An Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) and STIRPAT Analysis in Turkey
    Ojaghlou, Mortaza
    Ugurlu, Erginbay
    Kadlubek, Marta
    Thalassinos, Eleftherios
    RESOURCES-BASEL, 2023, 12 (05):
  • [35] Searching for an Environmental Kuznets Curve in China's air pollution
    Brajer, Victor
    Mead, Robert W.
    Xiao, Feng
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 22 (03) : 383 - 397
  • [36] Carbon Kuznets curve in China's building operations: Retrospective and prospective trajectories
    Chen, Minxia
    Ma, Minda
    Lin, Yinchao
    Ma, Zhili
    Li, Kai
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 803
  • [37] Does urbanization redefine the environmental Kuznets curve? An empirical analysis of 134 Countries
    Wang, Qiang
    Wang, Xiaowei
    Li, Rongrong
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2022, 76
  • [38] Investigating environmental Kuznets curve from an energy intensity perspective: Empirical evidence from China
    He, Yongda
    Lin, Boqiang
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 234 : 1013 - 1022
  • [39] Investigating Environmental Kuznets Curve in China-Aggregation bias and policy implications
    Xu, Tao
    ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 114 : 315 - 322
  • [40] The environmental Kuznets curve for carbon dioxide in India and China: Growth and pollution at crossroad
    Pal, Debdatta
    Mitra, Subrata Kumar
    JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 2017, 39 (02) : 371 - 385