Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: Research paradigms and challenges

被引：456

作者：

Dong, Yucheng ^{[1
]}

Zha, Quanbo ^{[1
]}

Zhang, Hengjie ^{[2
]}

Kou, Gang ^{[3
]}

Fujita, Hamido ^{[4
]}

Chiclana, Francisco ^{[5
]}

Herrera-Viedma, Enrique ^{[6
,7
]}

机构：

[1] Sichuan Univ, Sch Business, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China

[2] Hohai Univ, Sch Business, Nanjing 211100, Jiangsu, Peoples R China

[3] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Business Adm, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, Peoples R China

[4] Iwate Prefectural Univ, Fac Software & Informat Sci, Takizawa, Iwate, Japan

[5] De Montfort Univ, Fac Technol, Ctr Computat Intelligence, Leicester, Leics, England

[6] Univ Granada, Dept Comp Sci & Artificial Intelligence, E-18071 Granada, Spain

[7] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia

来源：

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS | 2018年 / 162卷

关键词：

Group decision making; Social network; Consensus; Opinion evolution; BOUNDED CONFIDENCE OPINION; VOTER MODEL; PREFERENCE RELATIONS; FUSION PROCESS; SZNAJD MODEL; MASS-MEDIA; DYNAMICS; SCALE; SOCIOPHYSICS; MANIPULATION;

D O I：

10.1016/j.knosys.2018.06.036

中图分类号：

TP18 [人工智能理论];

学科分类号：

081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;

摘要：

In social network group decision making (SNGDM), the consensus reaching process (CRP) is used to help decision makers with social relationships reach consensus. Many CRP studies have been conducted in SNGDM until now. This paper provides a review of CRPs in SNGDM, and as a result it classifies them into two paradigms: (i) the CRP paradigm based on trust relationships, and (ii) the CRP paradigm based on opinion evolution. Furthermore, identified research challenges are put forward to advance this area of research.

引用

页码：3 / 13

页数：11

共 143 条

[1] Opinion Formation by Informed Agents [J].

Afshar, Mohammad ;

Asadpour, Masoud .

JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, 2010, 13 (04)

[2] A consistency-based procedure to estimate missing pairwise preference values [J].

Alonso, S. ;

Chiclana, F. ;

Herrera, F. ;

Herrera-Viedma, E. ;

Alcala-Fdez, J. ;

Porcel, C. .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2008, 23 (02) :155-175

[3] A linguistic consensus model for Web 2.0 communities [J].

Alonso, S. ;

Perez, I. J. ;

Cabrerizo, F. J. ;

Herrera-Viedma, E. .

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2013, 13 (01) :149-157

[4] Influence maximization of informed agents in social networks [J].

AskariSichani, Omid ;

Jalili, Mahdi .

APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2015, 254 :229-239

[5] Emergence of scaling in random networks [J].

Barabási, AL ;

Albert, R .

SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5439) :509-512

[6] EVOLVING VOTER MODEL ON DENSE RANDOM GRAPHS [J].

Basu, Riddhipratim ;

Sly, Allan .

ANNALS OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2017, 27 (02) :1235-1288

[7] Minimum Cost Consensus With Quadratic Cost Functions [J].

Ben-Arieh, David ;

Easton, Todd ;

Evans, Brandon .

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2009, 39 (01) :210-217

[8] A NECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT CONDITION FOR REACHING A CONSENSUS USING DEGROOT METHOD [J].

BERGER, RL .

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1981, 76 (374) :415-418

[9] Election results and the Sznajd model on Barabasi network [J].

Bernardes, AT ;

Stauffer, D ;

Kertész, J .

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, 2002, 25 (01) :123-127

[10] Soft consensus measures in group decision making using unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information [J].

Cabrerizo, F. J. ;

Al-Hmouz, R. ;

Morfeq, A. ;

Balamash, A. S. ;

Martinez, M. A. ;

Herrera-Viedma, E. .

SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 21 (11) :3037-3050

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 →