共 2 条
Double jeopardy-pregnancy and birth during a catastrophic bushfire event followed by a pandemic lockdown, a natural experiment
被引:9
|作者:
Brew, Bronwyn K.
[1
,2
,7
]
Donnolley, Natasha
[1
,2
]
Henry, Amanda
[3
,4
]
Dahlen, Hannah
[5
]
Jalaludin, Bin
[6
]
Chambers, Georgina M.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] UNSW, Natl Perinatal Epidemiol & Stat Unit, Ctr Big Data Res Hlth, Kensington, Australia
[2] UNSW, Natl Perinatal Epidemiol & Stat Unit, Sch Clin Med, Kensington, Australia
[3] UNSW, Discipline Womens Hlth, Sch Clin Med, Kensington, Australia
[4] St George Hosp, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
[5] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Penrith, Australia
[6] UNSW Sydney, Ingham Inst Appl Med Res, Kensington, Australia
[7] Natl Perinatal Epidemiol & Stat Unit, Level 2,AGSM Bldg,UNSW Sydney Campus, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
基金:
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词:
Bushfire;
Wildfire;
Pandemic;
Perinatal;
Pregnancy;
COVID-19;
Birth;
PRENATAL MATERNAL STRESS;
AMBIENT AIR-POLLUTION;
PRETERM BIRTH;
PREMATURE RUPTURE;
OUTCOMES;
WEIGHT;
NEURODEVELOPMENT;
HEALTH;
ASTHMA;
D O I:
10.1016/j.envres.2022.113752
中图分类号:
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号:
08 ;
0830 ;
摘要:
Background: From November 2019 to January 2020, eastern Australia experienced the worst bushfires in recorded history. Two months later, Sydney and surrounds were placed into lockdown for six weeks due to the COVID-19 pandemic, followed by ongoing restrictions. Many pregnant women at this time were exposed to both the bushfires and COVID-19 restrictions. Objective: To assess the impact of exposure to bushfires and pandemic restrictions on perinatal outcomes. Methods: The study included 60 054 pregnant women who gave birth between November 2017 and December 2020 in South Sydney. Exposure cohorts were based on conception and birthing dates: 1) bushfire late pregnancy, born before lockdown; 2) bushfires in early-mid pregnancy, born during lockdown or soon after; 3) conceived during bushfires, lockdown in second trimester; 4) conceived after bushfires, pregnancy during restrictions. Exposure cohorts were compared with pregnancies in the matching periods in the two years prior. Associations between exposure cohorts and gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, hypertension, stillbirth, mode of birth, birthweight, preterm birth and small for gestational age were assessed using generalised estimating equations, adjusting for covariates. Results: A decrease in low birth weight was observed for cohort 1 (aOR 0.81, 95%CI 0.69, 0.95). Conversely, cohort 2 showed an increase in low birth weight, and increases in prelabour rupture of membranes, and caesarean sections (aOR 1.18, 95%CI 1.03, 1.37; aOR 1.21, 95%CI 1.07, 1.37; aOR 1.10 (1.02, 1.18) respectively). Cohort 3 showed an increase in unplanned caesarean sections and high birth weight babies (aOR 1.15, 95%CI 1.04, 1.27 and aOR 1.16, 95%CI 1.02, 1.31 respectively), and a decrease in gestational diabetes mellitus was observed for both cohorts 3 and 4. Conclusion: Pregnancies exposed to both severe climate events and pandemic disruptions appear to have increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes beyond only experiencing one event, but further research is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文