Benchmarking logistics facilities: a rating model to assess building quality and functionality

被引:21
作者
Baglio, Martina [1 ]
Perotti, Sara [2 ]
Dallari, Fabrizio [1 ]
Garagiola, Elisabetta Rachele [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Carlo Cattaneo, Sch Ind Engn, Castellanza, Italy
[2] Politecn Milan, Dept Management Econ & Ind Engn, Milan, Italy
关键词
Benchmarking; Warehouse; Building performance measurement; Cross-docking facility; Logistics facility; Rating system; REAL-ESTATE MARKETS; DELPHI METHOD; SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION; WAREHOUSE DESIGN; DECISION-MAKING; MANAGEMENT; METHODOLOGY; SELECTION; CRITERIA; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1108/BIJ-01-2019-0029
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose Logistics real estate has been experiencing a recent rebirth led by the growth of retailing and e-commerce. Although these sectors are looking for facilities matching their logistics needs, the identification of the most suitable building becomes a challenging task. To date, from both the practitioner's and academic perspectives there is a lack of models for assessing the quality of logistics facilities together with functionality (i.e. whether a warehouse is suitable for hosting a given logistics activity). The purpose of this paper is to fill this gap by developing a rating model for assessing the quality and functionality of logistics facilities. Design/methodology/approach A three-pronged methodology was adopted. First, a Systematic Literature Network Analysis (SLNA) was carried out to identify the relevant features that must be taken into consideration when assessing logistics real estate. Second, a Delphi method involving experts in the field was used to fine-tune the list of features that emerged from the SLNA process and to evaluate the importance of each feature from a company perspective. The rating model was developed and validated through pilot tests on 27 logistics facilities. Findings The rating model is divided into four sections: location, technical specifications, external spaces and internal areas. As an output, the model determines the building quality and main functionality, together with a gap analysis to detect the weakest emerging elements. Originality/value This research fills an identified research gap in the logistics real estate literature. Specifically, it offers a quantitative and shared evaluation method, which can be used to estimate building quality and functionality, thus extending the scope of the previous assessment methods available.
引用
收藏
页码:1239 / 1260
页数:22
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   ELECTRE I Based Relevance Decision-Makers Feedback to the Location Selection of Distribution Centers [J].
Agrebi, Maroi ;
Abed, Mourad ;
Omri, Andmohamed Nazih .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2017,
[2]   Vehicle scheduling and routing at a cross docking center for food supply chains [J].
Agustina, Dwi ;
Lee, C. K. M. ;
Piplani, Rajesh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2014, 152 :29-41
[3]   Impacts of logistics sprawl on the urban environment and logistics: Taxonomy and review of literature [J].
Aljohani, Khalid ;
Thompson, Russell G. .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 57 :255-263
[4]  
Ambrose B., 1990, J REAL ESTATE RES, V5, P355, DOI DOI 10.1080/10835547.1990.12090624
[5]   A comparison between environmental sustainability rating systems LEED and ITACA for residential buildings [J].
Asdrubali, F. ;
Baldinelli, G. ;
Bianchi, F. ;
Sambuco, S. .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 86 :98-108
[6]  
Baker P., 2004, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V15, P111, DOI [DOI 10.1108/09574090410700266, 10.1108/09574090410700266]
[7]   Warehouse design: A structured approach [J].
Baker, Peter ;
Canessa, Marco .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 193 (02) :425-436
[8]  
Battezzani L., 2000, INT J PHYS DISTRIBUT, V30, P413, DOI DOI 10.1108/09600030010336180
[9]  
Berardi U., 2011, INT J SUSTAINABLE BU, V2, P276
[10]   Sustainability Assessment in the Construction Sector: Rating Systems and Rated Buildings [J].
Berardi, Umberto .
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 20 (06) :411-424