Impact of short evidence summaries in discharge letters on adherence of practitioners to discharge medication.: A cluster-randomised controlled trial

被引:17
作者
Kunz, R.
Wegscheider, K.
Guyatt, G.
Zielinski, W.
Rakowsky, N.
Donner-Banzhoff, N.
Mueller-Lissner, S.
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Basel Inst Clin Epidemiol, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hamburg, Dept Stat & Econometry, Hamburg, Germany
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Clarity Res Grp, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Orthopad Fachklin Verein Oberlinhaus, Oberklin, Potsdam, Germany
[5] Park Klin Weissensee, Dept Internal Med, Berlin, Germany
[6] Univ Marburg, Dept Gen Practice Prevent & Rehabil, Marburg, Germany
来源
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE | 2007年 / 16卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/qshc.2006.020305
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: International concern about quality of medical care has led to intensive study of interventions to ensure care is consistent with best evidence. Simple, inexpensive, feasible and effective interventions remain limited. Objective: We examined the impact of one- sentence evidence summaries appended to consultants' letters to primary care practitioners on adherence of the practitioners to recommendations made by the consultants regarding medication for patients with chronic medical problems. Design: Cluster- randomised trial. Setting: Secondary/ primary care interface ( urban district hospital/ referral practices). Participants: 178 practices received one or more discharge letters with evidence summaries. The 66 practices in the intervention group provided feedback on 172 letters, and the 56 practices in the control group provided feedback on 96 letters. Results: Appending an evidence summary to discharge letters resulted in a decrease in non- adherence to discharge medication from 29.6% to 18.5% ( difference adjusted for underlying medical condition 12.5%; p = 0.039). Among the five possible reasons for discontinuing discharge medication, the evidence summaries seemed to have the largest impact on budget- related reasons for discontinuation ( 2.6% in the intervention versus 10.7% in the control group ( p = 0.052)). Most clinicians ( 72%) were enthusiastic about continuing receiving evidence summaries with discharge letters in routine care. Conclusions: The one- sentence evidence summary is a simple, inexpensive, well- accepted intervention that may improve primary care practitioners' adherence to evidence- based consultant recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 461
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Allery LA, 1997, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V314, P870
[2]  
*AM COLL PHYS, 1999, BEST EV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Permutation, Parametric and Bootstrap Tests of Hypotheses
[4]   Effect of linking practice data to published evidence - A randomized controlled trial of clinical direct reports [J].
Balas, EA ;
Boren, SA ;
Hicks, LL ;
Chonko, AM ;
Stephenson, K .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (01) :79-87
[5]   Computerised reminders and feedback in medication management: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials [J].
Bennett, JW ;
Glasziou, PP .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2003, 178 (05) :217-+
[6]   Just in time information for clinicians: a questionnaire evaluation of the ATTRACT project [J].
Brassey, J ;
Elwyn, G ;
Price, C ;
Kinnersley, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7285) :529-530
[7]   Secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease: randomised trial of effect on health [J].
Campbell, NC ;
Thain, J ;
Deans, HG ;
Ritchie, LD ;
Rawles, JM ;
Squair, JL .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7142) :1434-1437
[8]   A randomized controlled trial of point-of-care evidence to improve the antibiotic prescribing practices for otitis media in children [J].
Christakis, DA ;
Zimmerman, FJ ;
Wright, JA ;
Garrison, MM ;
Rivara, FP ;
Davis, RL .
PEDIATRICS, 2001, 107 (02) :art. no.-e15
[9]  
Cranney M, 1996, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V46, P661
[10]   RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION IN GENERAL-PRACTICE FOR PATIENTS AT HIGH CARDIOVASCULAR RISK [J].
CUPPLES, ME ;
MCKNIGHT, A .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6960) :993-996