Dexmedetomidine-ketamine and midazolam-ketamine combinations for sedation in pediatric patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized prospective study

被引:35
作者
Koruk, Senem [1 ]
Mizrak, Ayse [1 ]
Gul, Rauf [1 ]
Kilic, Ertugrul [1 ]
Yendi, Fatih [1 ]
Oner, Unsal [1 ]
机构
[1] Gaziantep Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, TR-27310 Sehitkamil, Gaziantep, Turkey
关键词
Dexmedetomidine; Sedation; ESWL; Pediatrics; TERM FOLLOW-UP; CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION; CHILDREN; PROPOFOL; HUMANS; ANESTHESIA; PHARMACOKINETICS; VOLUNTEERS; ANALGESIA; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1007/s00540-010-1023-1
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) requires sedation in pediatric patients. Dexmedetomidine is a relatively new agent used for sedation. The aim of this randomized prospective study was to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine-ketamine and midazolam-ketamine combinations on the recovery time, hemodynamic and respiratory variables, and side effects in pediatric patients undergoing ESWL. Fifty pediatric patients aged between 2 and 15 years who were scheduled for elective ESWL were randomized into two groups. In Group D we applied dexmedetomidine at1 mu g/kg, given over 10 min, and a bolus of 1 mg/kg ketamine for sedation. In Group M we applied midazolam at a 0.05 mg/kg bolus dose 10 min before the procedure and a 1 mg/kg bolus of ketamine. We measured and monitored the hemodynamic variables, oxygen saturation, and recovery time, and we also monitored the side effects. Four patients in group D refused to complete the study; 21 patients in group D and 25 patients in group M completed the study. We found the recovery time [eye-opening time (9.3 +/- A 4.5 vs. 16.2 +/- A 6.5 min; p < 0.001), verbal response time (12.8 +/- A 4.9 vs. 19.2 +/- A 7.2 min; p < 0.001), and the cooperation time (17.1 +/- A 5.0 vs. 23.3 +/- A 7.7 min; p < 0.001)] to be shorter in the dexmedetomidine group. Also, the heart rate values were lower in the dexmedetomidine group at the 20th minute of the procedure (99.1 +/- A 19.0 vs. 118.7 +/- A 7.3 beats/min; p = 0.016). In this study we found the recovery time to be shorter, with hemodynamic stability, in the dexmedetomidine group, compared with the midazolam group. So we can conclude that dexmedetomidine may be a good and safe alternative agent for sedation, with a shorter recovery period than midazolam, in the pediatric population.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 863
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
ALDRETE JA, 1970, ANESTH ANAL CURR RES, V49, P924
[2]  
Alhashemi JA, 2004, CAN J ANAESTH, V51, P342, DOI 10.1007/BF03018237
[3]   HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECTS OF KETAMINE IN CHILDREN UNDERGOING CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION [J].
BERMAN, W ;
FRIPP, RR ;
RUBLER, M ;
ALDERETE, L .
PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 1990, 11 (02) :72-76
[4]   EFFECTS OF INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN HUMANS .2. HEMODYNAMIC-CHANGES [J].
BLOOR, BC ;
WARD, DS ;
BELLEVILLE, JP ;
MAZE, M .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 77 (06) :1134-1142
[5]   Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children -: Efficacy, complications and long-term follow-up [J].
Brinkmann, OA ;
Griehl, A ;
Kuwertz-Bröking, E ;
Bulla, M ;
Hertle, L .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 39 (05) :591-597
[6]  
Cox RG, 2006, CAN J ANAESTH, V53, P1213, DOI 10.1007/BF03021583
[7]   THE PHARMACOKINETICS AND HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECTS OF INTRAVENOUS AND INTRAMUSCULAR DEXMEDETOMIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE IN ADULT HUMAN VOLUNTEERS [J].
DYCK, JB ;
MAZE, M ;
HAACK, C ;
VUORILEHTO, L ;
SHAFER, SL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 78 (05) :813-820
[8]   The effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans [J].
Ebert, TJ ;
Hall, JE ;
Barney, JA ;
Uhrich, TD ;
Colinco, MD .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (02) :382-394
[9]  
Erden IA, 2007, SAUDI MED J, V28, P364
[10]   The effects of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl on emergence characteristics after adenoidectomy in children [J].
Erdil, F. ;
Demirbilek, S. ;
Begec, Z. ;
Ozturk, E. ;
Ulger, M. H. ;
Ersoy, M. O. .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2009, 37 (04) :571-576