Time to publication of oncology trials and why some trials are never published

被引:22
作者
Chapman, Paul B. [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Nathan J. [2 ]
Zhou, Qin [3 ]
Iasonos, Alexia [3 ]
Hanley, Sara [1 ]
Bosl, George J. [1 ,2 ]
Spriggs, David R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med Coll, New York, NY USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Epidemiol Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
POSITIVE-OUTCOME BIAS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; SUBSEQUENT PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZED-TRIALS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0184025
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Very little is known about the proportion of oncology trials that get published, the time it takes to publish them, or the reasons why oncology trials do not get published. Methods We analyzed all clinical trials that closed to accrual at our cancer center between 2009-2013. Trials were categorized by study purpose (therapeutic vs. diagnostic), phase (pilot, phase I, II, or III), and sponsor (industrial, cooperative group, institutional, or peer-reviewed). Final publications were identified in MEDLINE and EMBASE by NCT numbers, or by querying the principal investigator. For trials not published, we surveyed the principal investigators to identify the reason for non-publication. Findings 469 of 809 protocols (58%) had been published by November 2016. The calculated probability of publication 7 years after completing accrual was 70.4%; the calculated median time to publication was 47 months. Only 18.8% of protocols overall were estimated to be published within 2 years from completing accrual. The calculated probability of publication was higher for therapeutic trials than non-therapeutic trials, but there was no difference based on phase or sponsor. Among protocols not published, 45.3% had completed accrual, and among these, a majority had a manuscript in preparation or review, or the trial was still collecting data. Failure to publish due to a pharmaceutical sponsor was rare. 30.6% of unpublished trials had closed for various reasons before completing accrual, usually due to poor accrual or pharmaceutical sponsor issues. Interpretation Almost 30% of trials were calculated to be unpublished by 7 years after closing to accrual at our institution. Failure to reach accrual goals was an important factor in non-publication. We have devised new institutional policies that identify trials likely not to meet accrual goals and require early closure. We should be able to shorten the time from accrual completion to publication, especially for pilot and phase I trials for which long follow up is not needed.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting [J].
Callaham, ML ;
Wears, RL ;
Weber, EJ ;
Barton, C ;
Young, G .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (03) :254-257
[2]   Presentation and subsequent publication rates of Phase I oncology clinical trials [J].
Camacho, LH ;
Bacik, J ;
Cheung, A ;
Spriggs, DR .
CANCER, 2005, 104 (07) :1497-1504
[3]   Publication and reporting of clinical trial results: cross sectional analysis across academic medical centers [J].
Chen, Ruijun ;
Desai, Nihar R. ;
Ross, Joseph S. ;
Zhang, Weiwei ;
Chau, Katherine H. ;
Wayda, Brian ;
Murugiah, Karthik ;
Lu, Daniel Y. ;
Mittal, Amit ;
Krumholz, Harlan M. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 352
[4]   Publication status of contemporary oncology randomised controlled trials worldwide [J].
Chen, Yu-Pei ;
Liu, Xu ;
Lv, Jia-Wei ;
Li, Wen-Fei ;
Zhang, Yuan ;
Guo, Ying ;
Lin, Ai-Hua ;
Sun, Ying ;
Mao, Yan-Ping ;
Ma, Jun .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 66 :17-25
[5]  
Davis FG, 1999, CANCER, V85, P485, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990115)85:2<485::AID-CNCR29>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-L
[7]   THE FATE OF ABSTRACTS SUBMITTED TO A CANCER MEETING - FACTORS WHICH INFLUENCE PRESENTATION AND SUBSEQUENT PUBLICATION [J].
DEBELLEFEUILLE, C ;
MORRISON, CA ;
TANNOCK, IF .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1992, 3 (03) :187-191
[8]   Adult patient perspectives on clinical trial result reporting: A survey of cancer patients [J].
Elzinga, Kate E. ;
Khan, Omar F. ;
Tang, Andrew R. ;
Fernandez, Conrad V. ;
Elzinga, Christine L. ;
Heng, Daniel Y. C. ;
Vickers, Michael M. ;
Truong, Tony H. ;
Tango, Patricia A. .
CLINICAL TRIALS, 2016, 13 (06) :574-581
[9]   Testing for the Presence of Positive-Outcome Bias in Peer Review A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Emerson, Gwendolyn B. ;
Warme, Winston J. ;
Wolf, Fredric M. ;
Heckman, James D. ;
Brand, Richard A. ;
Leopold, Seth S. .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 170 (21) :1934-1939
[10]   Publication Outcomes of Phase II Oncology Clinical Trials [J].
Hoeg, Rasmus T. ;
Lee, Jennifer A. ;
Mathiason, Michelle A. ;
Rokkones, Kristina ;
Serck, Stephanie L. ;
Crampton, Kaye L. ;
Emmel, Ann E. ;
Severson, Eileen A. ;
Go, Ronald S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2009, 32 (03) :253-257