The Harris hip score: Do ceiling effects limit its usefulness in orthopedics?

被引:210
作者
Wamper, Kim E. [1 ]
Sierevelt, Inger N. [1 ]
Poolman, Rudolf W. [2 ]
Bhandari, Mohit [3 ,4 ]
Haverkamp, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] OLVG, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] McMaster Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed Surg, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
HEALTH-STATUS; ARTHROPLASTY; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPLACEMENT; INSTRUMENTS; VALIDITY; DUTCH;
D O I
10.3109/17453674.2010.537808
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Methods We performed a systematic review based on a literature search in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for descriptive studies published in 2007. 54 studies (59 patient groups) met our criteria and were included in the data analysis. To determine the content validity, we calculated the ceiling effect (percentage) for each separate study and we pooled data to measure the weighted mean. A subanalysis of indications for THA was performed to differentiate the populations for which the HHS would be suitable and for which it would not. A ceiling effect of 15% or less was considered to be acceptable. Results Over half the studies (31/59) revealed unacceptable ceiling effects. Pooled data across the studies included (n = 6,667 patients) suggested ceiling effects of 20% (95%CI: 18-22). Ceiling effects were greater (32%, 95%CI:12-52) in those patients undergoing hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Interpretation Although the Harris hip score is widely used in arthroplasty research on outcomes, ceiling effects are common and these severely limit its validity in this field of research.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 707
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
DEGROOT IB, 2009, Osteoarthritis Carti, V17, P1
[2]   The "Oxford Heup Score" - The translation and validation of a questionnaire into Dutch to evaluate the results of total hip arthroplasty [J].
Gosens, T ;
Hoefnagels, NHM ;
de Vet, RCW ;
Dhert, WJA ;
van Langelaan, EJ ;
Bulstra, SK ;
Geesink, RGT .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2005, 76 (02) :204-211
[4]  
Haverkamp D, 2008, J Long Term Eff Med Implants, V18, P145
[5]   The reliability of hip scoring systems for total hip arthroplasty candidates: assessment by physical therapists [J].
Kirmit, L ;
Karatosun, V ;
Unver, B ;
Bakirhan, S ;
Sen, A ;
Gocen, Z .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2005, 19 (06) :659-661
[6]   INDIVIDUAL-PATIENT MONITORING IN CLINICAL-PRACTICE - ARE AVAILABLE HEALTH-STATUS SURVEYS ADEQUATE [J].
MCHORNEY, CA ;
TARLOV, AR .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1995, 4 (04) :293-307
[7]   Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement [J].
Moher, David ;
Liberati, Alessandro ;
Tetzlaff, Jennifer ;
Altman, Douglas G. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 62 (10) :1006-1012
[8]   Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement - A comparison of five instruments of health status [J].
Ostendorf, M ;
van Stel, HF ;
Buskens, E ;
Schrijvers, AJP ;
Marting, LN ;
Verbout, AJ ;
Dhert, WJA .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (06) :801-808
[9]   Outcome Instruments: Rationale for Their Use [J].
Poolman, Rudolf W. ;
Swiontkowski, Marc F. ;
Fairbank, Jeremy C. T. ;
Schemitsch, Emil H. ;
Sprague, Sheila ;
de Vet, Henrica C. W. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A :41-49
[10]  
Ragab AA, 2003, BIOMED SCI INSTRUM, V39, P579