European Green Mutual Fund Performance: A Comparative Analysis with their Conventional and Black Peers

被引:97
作者
Ibikunle, Gbenga [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Steffen, Tom [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Business, 29 Buccleuch Pl, Edinburgh EH8 9JS, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ St Andrews, Ctr Responsible Banking & Finance, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
[3] Fdn European Capital Markets Cooperat Res Ctr ECM, Pescara, Italy
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] Macquarie Univ, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] CMCRC, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Green mutual funds; Black mutual funds; Conventional mutual funds; Socially responsible investments; Risk-adjusted returns; SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENT; STOCK-PRICES; CROSS-SECTION; CLEAN ENERGY; OIL PRICES; SELECTION; MARKET; RISK; PORTFOLIOS; COMPANIES;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-015-2850-7
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We conduct the first comparative analysis of the financial performance of European green, black (fossil energy and natural resource) and conventional mutual funds. Based on a unique dataset of 175 green, 259 black and 976 conventional mutual funds, the investigation contrasts the financial performance of the three dissimilar investment orientations over the 1991-2014 period. Over the full sample period, green mutual funds significantly underperform relative to conventional funds, while no significant risk-adjusted performance differences between green and black mutual funds could be established during the same period. Environmentally friendly investment vehicles display a significant exposure to small cap and growth stocks, while black funds are more exposed to value stocks. Remarkably, the green funds' risk-adjusted return profile progressively improves over time until no difference in the performance of the green and the conventional classes could be discerned. Further evidence suggests that the green funds are beginning to significantly outperform their black peers, especially over the 2012-2014 investment window.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 355
页数:19
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Determinants of renewable energy growth: A global sample analysis [J].
Aguirre, Mariana ;
Ibikunle, Gbenga .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 69 :374-384
[2]   Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Lanoie, Paul .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2008, 23 (04) :45-62
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Accounting, Auditing Accountability Journal, DOI [10.1108/09513579210019521, DOI 10.1108/09513579210019521]
[4]  
Ansar A., 2013, STRANDED ASSETS FOSS
[5]   International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style [J].
Bauer, R ;
Koedijk, K ;
Otten, R .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2005, 29 (07) :1751-1767
[6]   Short-Selling Bans Around the World: Evidence from the 2007-09 Crisis [J].
Beber, Alessandro ;
Pagano, Marco .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2013, 68 (01) :343-381
[7]  
BECK N, 1995, AM POLIT SCI REV, V89, P634, DOI 10.2307/2082979
[8]   What drove the mid-2000s explosiveness in alternative energy stock prices? Evidence from US, European and global indices [J].
Bohl, Martin T. ;
Kaufmann, Philipp ;
Siklos, Pierre L. .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2015, 40 :194-206
[9]   From hero to zero: Evidence of performance reversal and speculative bubbles in German renewable energy stocks [J].
Bohl, Martin T. ;
Kaufmann, Philipp ;
Stephan, Patrick M. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 37 :40-51
[10]   Multi-horizon Markowitz portfolio performance appraisals: A general approach [J].
Briec, Walter ;
Kerstens, Kristiaan .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009, 37 (01) :50-62