Variation in the design of Do Not Resuscitate orders and other code status options: a multi-institutional qualitative study

被引:13
作者
Batten, Jason N. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Blythe, Jacob A. [3 ]
Wieten, Sarah [3 ]
Cotler, Miriam Piven [4 ]
Kayser, Joshua B. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Porter-Williamson, Karin [8 ]
Harman, Stephanie [1 ,3 ]
Dzeng, Elizabeth [9 ]
Magnus, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Anesthesia, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford Ctr Biomed Eth, Stanford, CA USA
[4] Calif State Univ Northridge, Dept Hlth Sci, Northridge, CA 91330 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Med, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Med Eth & Hlth Policy, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[7] Corporal Michael J Crescenz Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Philadelphia, PA USA
[8] Univ Kansas, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Kansas City, KS USA
[9] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
medical emergency team; hospital medicine; critical care; communication; shared decision making; LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENT; 2 DIFFERENT PROTOCOLS; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; DECISION-MAKING; HOSPITAL VARIATION; END; DNR; VARIABILITY; PATIENT; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011222
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background US hospitals typically provide a set of code status options that includes Full Code and Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) but often includes additional options. Although US hospitals differ in the design of code status options, this variation and its impacts have not been empirically studied. Design and methods Multi-institutional qualitative study at 7 US hospitals selected for variability in geographical location, type of institution and design of code status options. We triangulated across three data sources (policy documents, code status ordering menus and in-depth physician interviews) to characterise the code status options available at each hospital. Using inductive qualitative methods, we investigated design differences in hospital code status options and the perceived impacts of these differences. Results The code status options at each hospital varied widely with regard to the number of code status options, the names and definitions of code status options, and the formatting and capabilities of code status ordering menus. DNR orders were named and defined differently at each hospital studied. We identified five key design characteristics that impact the function of a code status order. Each hospital's code status options were unique with respect to these characteristics, indicating that code status plays differing roles in each hospital. Physician participants perceived that the design of code status options shapes communication and decision-making practices about resuscitation and life-sustaining treatments, especially at the end of life. We identified four potential mechanisms through which this may occur: framing conversations, prompting decisions, shaping inferences and creating categories. Conclusions There are substantive differences in the design of hospital code status options that may contribute to known variability in end-of-life care and treatment intensity among US hospitals. Our framework can be used to design hospital code status options or evaluate their function.
引用
收藏
页码:668 / 677
页数:10
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
American Medical Association, ORD NOT ATT RES DNAR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Circulation, V102, pI60
[3]   Relationship between staff perceptions of hospital norms and hospital-level end-of-life treatment intensity [J].
Barnato, Amber E. ;
Bost, James E. ;
Farrell, Maxwell H. ;
Lave, Judith R. ;
Arnold, Robert M. ;
Rubio, Doris M. ;
Angus, Derek C. .
JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2007, 10 (05) :1093-1100
[4]   Norms of decision making in the ICU: a case study of two academic medical centers at the extremes of end-of-life treatment intensity [J].
Barnato, Amber E. ;
Tate, Judith A. ;
Rodriguez, Keri L. ;
Zickmund, Susan L. ;
Arnold, Robert M. .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 38 (11) :1886-1896
[5]   No Escalation of Treatment: Moving Beyond the Withholding/Withdrawing Debate [J].
Batten, Jason N. ;
Blythe, Jacob A. ;
Wieten, Sarah E. ;
Dzeng, Elizabeth W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2019, 19 (03) :63-65
[6]   The effect of do-not-resuscitate orders on physician decision-making [J].
Beach, MC ;
Morrison, RS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2002, 50 (12) :2057-2061
[7]   Ethical challenges of partial do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders - Placing DNR orders in the context of a life-threatening conditions care plan [J].
Berger, JT .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 163 (19) :2270-2275
[8]   Code status and resuscitation options in the electronic health record [J].
Bhatia, Haresh L. ;
Patel, Neal R. ;
Choma, Neesha N. ;
Grande, Jonathan ;
Giuse, Dario A. ;
Lehmann, Christoph U. .
RESUSCITATION, 2015, 87 :14-20
[9]   Differentiating DNI From DNR: Combating Code Status Conflation [J].
Breu, Anthony C. ;
Herzig, Shoshana J. .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2014, 9 (10) :669-670
[10]   HISTORY OF MEDICINE The DNR Order after 40 Years [J].
Burns, Jeffrey P. ;
Truog, Robert D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (06) :504-506