Framework of airfoil max lift-to-drag ratio prediction using hybrid feature mining and Gaussian process regression

被引:6
作者
Chen, Yaoran [1 ]
Dong, Zhikun [1 ]
Su, Jie [1 ]
Wang, Yan [1 ]
Han, Zhaolong [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhou, Dai [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhao, Yongsheng [1 ,2 ]
Bao, Yan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Naval Architecture Ocean & Civil Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, State Key Lab Ocean Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Key Lab Hydrodynam, Minist Educ, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Key Lab Digital Maintenance Bldg & Infra, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Airfoil; Max lift-to-drag ratio; Gaussian process regression; Feature pool; Feature selection; AXIS WIND TURBINE; OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114339
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The maximum lift-to-drag coefficient of an airfoil directly affects the aerodynamic performance of wind turbine. Machine learning methods are known for being really effective in helping to predict this parameter in a faster and more accurate way. So far, the majority of related studies have focused on the use of artificial neural networks to make this prediction, but this model has issues with its poor interpretation and the confidence level of its results was unclear. In this paper, a novel framework is proposed, involving the Gaussian process regression and a hybrid feature mining process. The aim is to use the new framework to evaluate the maximum lift-to-drag ratio of given airfoils under a turbulent flow condition, where the Reynolds number is around 100,000. The feature mining process here designed contains a hybrid feature pool that comprises various geometric characters, and a hybrid feature selector that can assist the prediction performance and make it better. Based on the airfoil dataset of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign that contains a total of 1432 profiles, a comparative analysis was conducted. The results showed that the current framework can provide a more accurate estimate than parallel models in both single-point and interval aspects of view. Noticeably, the model reached an overall precision of 95.2% and 94.1% on training and testing sets, respectively. Moreover, the simplicity and the confidence reference from the model output were further illustrated with a case study, which also verified that how it can serve real engineering application.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Abbott I., 1945, Summary of Airfoil Data-NACA Report 824
  • [2] Efficient aerodynamic design through evolutionary programming and support vector regression algorithms
    Andres, E.
    Salcedo-Sanz, S.
    Monge, F.
    Perez-Bellido, A. M.
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (12) : 10700 - 10708
  • [3] Unsteady thrust on an oscillating wind turbine: Comparison of blade-element momentum theory with actuator-line CFD
    Apsley, D. D.
    Stansby, P. K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2020, 98
  • [4] AYODELE TR, 2020, WORLD, V3, P618
  • [5] Bellman M, C IMPR GEN ALG EFF A, P1096
  • [6] Incremental Wrapper-based Subset Selection with Replacement: an advantageous alternative to sequential forward selection
    Bermejo, Pablo
    Gamez, Jose A.
    Puerta, Jose M.
    [J]. 2009 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND DATA MINING, 2009, : 367 - 374
  • [7] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [8] Gaussian Process Regression for numerical wind speed prediction enhancement
    Cai, Haoshu
    Jia, Xiaodong
    Feng, Jianshe
    Li, Wenzhe
    Hsu, Yuan-Ming
    Lee, Jay
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 146 : 2112 - 2123
  • [9] Multiple Aerodynamic Coefficient Prediction of Airfoils Using a Convolutional Neural Network
    Chen, Hai
    He, Lei
    Qian, Weiqi
    Wang, Song
    [J]. SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2020, 12 (04):
  • [10] Airfoil parameterization evaluation based on a modified PARASEC method for a H-Darrious rotor
    Chen, Jian
    Pan, Xiong
    Wang, Canxing
    Hu, Guojun
    Xu, Hongtao
    Liu, Pengwei
    [J]. ENERGY, 2019, 187