Propagation of the velocity model uncertainties to the seismic event location

被引:44
作者
Gesret, A. [1 ]
Desassis, N. [1 ]
Noble, M. [1 ]
Romary, T. [1 ]
Maisons, C. [2 ]
机构
[1] PSL Res Univ, MINES ParisTech, Ctr Geosci, F-77300 Fontainebleau, France
[2] Magnitude SAS, Ctr Regain, F-04220 St Tulle, France
关键词
Inverse theory; Probability distribution; Seismic tomography; Theoretical seismology; FINITE-DIFFERENCE COMPUTATION; EARTHQUAKE LOCATION; NEIGHBORHOOD ALGORITHM; GEOPHYSICAL INVERSION; TRAVEL-TIMES; TOMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1093/gji/ggu374
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Earthquake hypocentre locations are crucial in many domains of application (academic and industrial) as seismic event location maps are commonly used to delineate faults or fractures. The interpretation of these maps depends on location accuracy and on the reliability of the associated uncertainties. The largest contribution to location and uncertainty errors is due to the fact that the velocity model errors are usually not correctly taken into account. We propose a new Bayesian formulation that integrates properly the knowledge on the velocity model into the formulation of the probabilistic earthquake location. In this work, the velocity model uncertainties are first estimated with a Bayesian tomography of active shot data. We implement a sampling Monte Carlo type algorithm to generate velocity models distributed according to the posterior distribution. In a second step, we propagate the velocity model uncertainties to the seismic event location in a probabilistic framework. This enables to obtain more reliable hypocentre locations as well as their associated uncertainties accounting for picking and velocity model uncertainties. We illustrate the tomography results and the gain in accuracy of earthquake location for two synthetic examples and one real data case study in the context of induced microseismicity.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 66
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Constrained tomography of realistic velocity models in microseismic monitoring using calibration shots [J].
Bardainne, T. ;
Gaucher, E. .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2010, 58 (05) :738-752
[2]   Inversion of receiver functions without deconvolution-application to the Indian craton [J].
Bodin, Thomas ;
Yuan, Huaiyu ;
Romanowicz, Barbara .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 196 (02) :1025-1033
[3]  
Bodin T, 2009, GEOPHYS J INT, V178, P1411, DOI [10.1111/J.1365-246X.2009.04226.X, 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04226.x]
[4]   Evidence for both crustal and mantle earthquakes in the subducting Juan de Fuca plate [J].
Cassidy, JF ;
Waldhauser, F .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2003, 30 (02) :67-1
[5]   Stochastic velocity inversion of seismic reflection/refraction traveltime data for rift structure of the southwest Barents Sea [J].
Clark, Stephen A. ;
Faleide, Jan Inge ;
Hauser, Juerg ;
Ritzmann, Oliver ;
Rolf, Mjelde ;
Ebbing, Jorg ;
Thybo, Hans ;
Fluh, Ernst .
TECTONOPHYSICS, 2013, 593 :135-150
[6]   Seismic Tomography by Monte Carlo Sampling [J].
Debski, Wojciech .
PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2010, 167 (1-2) :131-152
[7]  
Eisner Leo, 2009, Leading Edge, V28, P648, DOI 10.1190/1.3148403
[8]  
EVERNDEN JF, 1969, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V59, P1365
[9]   CONFIDENCE REGIONS AND ERROR DETERMINATIONS FOR SEISMIC EVENT LOCATION [J].
FLINN, EA .
REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 1965, 3 (01) :157-&
[10]  
Gesret A., 2011, P 3 EAGE PASS SEISM