The Sweetened Beverage Tax in Cook County, Illinois: Lessons From a Failed Effort

被引:32
作者
Chriqui, Jamie F. [1 ,2 ]
Sansone, Christina N. [3 ]
Powell, Lisa M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Hlth Policy & Adm, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Ctr Hlth Policy, Inst Hlth Res & Policy IHRP, Chicago, IL USA
[3] IHRP, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
SOFT DRINKS; COVERAGE; MEXICO;
D O I
10.2105/AJPH.2020.305640
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives. To describe the public health and policy lessons learned from the failure of the Cook County, Illinois, Sweetened Beverage Tax (SBT). Methods. This retrospective, mixed-methods, qualitative study involved key informant (KI) and discussion group interviews and document analysis including news media, court documents, testimony, letters, and press releases. Two coders used Atlas.ti v.8A to analyze 321 documents (from September 2016 through December 2017) and 6 KI and discussion group transcripts (from December 2017 through August 2018). Results. Key lessons were (1) the SBT process needed to be treated as a political campaign, (2) there was inconsistent messaging regarding the tax purpose (i.e., revenue vs public health), (3) it was important to understand the local context and constraints, (4) there was implementation confusion, and (5) the media influenced an antitax backlash. Conclusions. The experience with the implementation and repeal of the Cook County SBT provides important lessons for future beverage tax efforts. Public Health Implications. Beverage taxation efforts need to be treated as political campaigns requiring strong coalitions, clear messaging, substantial resources, and work within the local context.
引用
收藏
页码:1009 / 1016
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
American Beverage Association and Illinois Beverage Association, 2017, WE DEL CHIC COAL MEM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Chicago Tribune
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CHICAGO SUN TIMES
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, FISC POL DIET PREV N
[5]  
[Anonymous], IMPACT COOK COUNTY I
[6]   In Mexico, Evidence Of Sustained Consumer Response Two Years After Implementing A Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax [J].
Arantxa Colchero, M. ;
Rivera-Dommarco, Juan ;
Popkin, Barry M. ;
Ng, Shu Wen .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2017, 36 (03) :564-571
[7]   Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study [J].
Arantxa Colchero, M. ;
Popkin, Barry M. ;
Rivera, Juan A. ;
Ng, Shu Wen .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 352
[8]   The palatability of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation: A content analysis of newspaper coverage of the UK sugar debate [J].
Buckton, Christina H. ;
Patterson, Chris ;
Hyseni, Lirije ;
Katikireddi, S. Vittal ;
Lloyd-Williams, Ffion ;
Elliott-Green, Alex ;
Capewell, Simon ;
Hilton, Shona .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (12)
[9]   The impact of the Philadelphia beverage tax on purchases and consumption by adults and children [J].
Cawley, John ;
Frisvold, David ;
Hill, Anna ;
Jones, David .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2019, 67
[10]   Beverages Sales in Mexico before and after Implementation of a Sugar Sweetened Beverage Tax [J].
Colchero, M. A. ;
Manuel Guerrero-Lopez, Carlos ;
Molina, Mariana ;
Angel Rivera, Juan .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (09)