Clarifying the project complexity construct: Past, present and future

被引:176
作者
Bakhshi, Javad [1 ]
Ireland, Vernon [1 ]
Gorod, Alex [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
关键词
Project complexity; Complex projects; System of systems; Systematic review; Complexity theories; Histogram analysis; REDUCING COMPLEXITY; MANAGEMENT; UNCERTAINTY; FIT; KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK; INDEX; TASK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.002
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The research explores the historical development of project complexity. Projects are becoming more complex due to unexpected emergent behaviour and characteristics. Complexity has become an inseparable aspect of systems and also one of the important factors in the failure of projects. While much has been written about project complexity, there is still a lack of understanding of what constitutes project complexity. This research includes a systematic literature review to demonstrate the current understanding of commonalities and differences in the existing research. This was achieved by examining more than 420 published research papers, drawn from an original group of approximately 10,000, based on citations during the period of 1990-2015. As a result of this exploration, an integrative systemic framework is presented to demonstrate understanding of project complexity. It was found that there are three primary and distinctive models of project complexity, the Project Management Institute view, the System of Systems view and the view developed from the analysis of citations of research papers, which is called the Complexity Theories view. Further testing is required on a range of complex projects in order to attempt to reconcile these views. Crown Copyright (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1199 / 1213
页数:15
相关论文
共 131 条
[101]   Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences [J].
Rowley, TJ .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1997, 22 (04) :887-910
[102]  
Santana G., 1990, International Journal of Project Management, V8, P102, DOI 10.1016/0263-7863(90)90044-C
[103]   Mastering Complexity and Changes in Projects, Economy, and Society via Project Management Second Order (PM-2) [J].
Saynisch, Manfred .
PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 41 (05) :4-20
[104]   Beyond Frontiers of Traditional Project Management: An Approach to Evolutionary, Self-Organizational Principles and the Complexity Theory-Results of the Research Program [J].
Saynisch, Manfred .
PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 41 (02) :21-37
[105]   Relationships between Project Complexity and Communication [J].
Senescu, Reid Robert ;
Aranda-Mena, Guillermo ;
Haymaker, John Riker .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2013, 29 (02) :183-197
[106]  
Sheard SarahA., 2012, ASSESSING IMPACT COM
[107]  
Shenhar A., 2004, WILEY GUIDE MANAGING, P1265, DOI [10.1002/9780470172391.ch50, DOI 10.1002/9780470172391.CH50]
[108]  
Shenhar A.J., 2001, Journal of High Technology Management Research, V12, P239
[109]   A two-dimensional taxonomy of products and innovations [J].
Shenhar, AJ ;
Dvir, D ;
Shulman, Y .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 1995, 12 (03) :175-200
[110]   One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains [J].
Shenhar, AJ .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (03) :394-414