Organization structure, competition and performance measurement systems and their joint effects on performance

被引:78
|
作者
Lee, Chia-Ling [1 ]
Yang, Huan-Jung [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chung Cheng Univ, Dept Accounting & Informat Technol, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Performance measurement systems; Organization structure; Competition; Performance; MANAGEMENT CONTROL-SYSTEMS; NONFINANCIAL MEASURES; ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS; COMPONENT ANALYSIS; STRATEGY; IMPACT; DECISION; IMPLEMENTATION; DETERMINANTS; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.mar.2010.10.003
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study examines the effect of organization structure and competition on the design of performance measurement systems (PMSs) and their joint effects on performance. The design of performance measurement systems is investigated using two dimensions: the use of integrated measures related to the four perspectives of the balanced scorecard (BSC) and the stage of development of PMSs. The data for this study were collected from 168 valid responses (25.19%) of Taiwanese firms listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. The results indicate that organization structure is significantly associated with the design of PMSs. Compared to mechanistic organizations, organic organizations make greater use of integrated measures and the higher developmental stages of PMSs. The findings also partly support the presence of joint effects on performance involving organization structure, competition, and the use of PMSs. Specifically, the results show that when there is greater competition among firms, a positive relationship between the stages of PMS development and performance is of higher significance. Another conclusion derived from this study is that the use of integrated measures is more relevant with respect to organizational performance in mechanistic organizations than in organic ones. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 104
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Managerial attitudes towards the incompleteness of performance measurement systems
    Islam, Syrus
    Adler, Ralph
    Northcott, Deryl
    QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 15 (01): : 84 - 103
  • [42] The quality strategy impact on organization's performance
    Smith Ramirez, Eric Arturo
    REVISTA CIENCIAS ESTRATEGICAS, 2016, 24 (35): : 15 - 31
  • [43] Examining the joint effects of strategic priorities, use of management control systems, and personal background on hospital performance
    de Harlez, Yannick
    Malagueno, Ricardo
    MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2016, 30 : 2 - 17
  • [44] Design and implementation of a performance measurement system for a research organization
    Mettänen, P
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2005, 16 (02) : 178 - 188
  • [45] Translating knowledge management into performance The role of performance measurement systems
    Asiaei, Kaveh
    Bontis, Nick
    MANAGEMENT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2019, 43 (01): : 113 - 132
  • [46] The joint effects of performance measurement system design and TMT cognitive conflict on innovation ambidexterity
    Bedford, David S.
    Bisbe, Josep
    Sweeney, Breda
    MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2022, 57
  • [47] Performance measurement systems in higher education: How levers of control reveal the ambiguities of reforms
    Pilonato, Silvia
    Monfardini, Patrizio
    BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2020, 52 (03):
  • [48] A Heuristic Model for Establishing Trade-Offs in Corporate Sustainability Performance Measurement Systems
    Pryshlakivsky, Jonathan
    Searcy, Cory
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2017, 144 (02) : 323 - 342
  • [49] Management control systems and real earnings management: Effects on firm performance
    Osma, Beatriz Garcia
    Gomez-Conde, Jacobo
    Lopez-Valeiras, Ernesto
    MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2022, 55
  • [50] PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS IN HIGHER EDUCATION
    Ilies, Liviu
    Butilca, Delia
    Fekete, Adriana
    Crisan, Emil
    QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION, VOL 1, 2010, : 147 - 150