Validation of the Seventh Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer

被引:65
作者
Jung, Hun [1 ]
Lee, Han Hong [1 ]
Song, Kyo Young [1 ]
Jeon, Hae Myung [1 ]
Park, Cho Hyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Dept Surg, Coll Med, Seoul 137701, South Korea
关键词
seventh edition American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system; gastric cancer; validation; hybrid TNM staging system; LYMPH-NODE METASTASES; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; CLASSIFICATION; SUBCLASSIFICATION; NUMBER; UNION; EXPERIENCE; DEPTH; RATIO;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.25778
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM classification for gastric cancer was published in 2010 and included major revisions. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the validity of the seventh edition TNM classification for gastric cancer based on an Asian population. METHODS: A total of 2916 gastric cancer patients who underwent RO surgical resection from 1989 through 2008 in a single institute were included, and were analyzed according to the seventh edition of the TNM classification for validation. RESULTS: When adjusted using the seventh edition of the TNM classification, upstaging was observed in 771 patients (26.4%) and downstaging was observed in 178 patients (6.1%) compared with the sixth edition of the TNM classification. The relative risk (RR) of seventh edition pT classification was found to be increased with regular intensity compared with the sixth edition pT classification. The RR of seventh edition pN classification was found to be increased with irregular intensity compared with the sixth edition pN classification. In survival analysis, there were significant differences noted for each stage of disease, but only a marginal difference was demonstrated between stage IA and stage IB (P=.049). In the hybrid TNM classification, which combines the seventh edition pT classification and the sixth edition pN classification, both pT and pN classifications demonstrated a more ideal distribution of the RR, and 5-year survival rates also showed a significant difference for each stage (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: The seventh edition of the TNM classification was considered valid based on the results of the current study. However, the hybrid TNM classification, comprised of a combination of the seventh edition pT classification and sixth edition pN classification, should be considered for the next edition. Cancer 2011; 117: 2371-8. (C) 2011 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:2371 / 2378
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, AJCC CANC STAGING MA
[2]  
Aurello P, 2007, AM SURGEON, V73, P359
[3]  
Chun J, 2006, J CLIN ONCOL, V24, p186S
[4]   Tumour regression grade (TRG) analyses in patients with resectable gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinomas treated with platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J].
Fareed, Khaleel R. ;
Ilyas, Mohammad ;
Kaye, Philip V. ;
Soomro, Irshad N. ;
Lobo, Dileep N. ;
Parsons, Simon L. ;
Madhusudan, Srinivasan .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2009, 55 (04) :399-406
[5]  
Greene F., 2002, AJCC cancer staging handbook: From the AJCC cancer staging manual, V6th
[6]   Prognostic Significance of the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes: Is UICC/TNM Node Classification Perfectly Suitable for Early Gastric Cancer? [J].
Huang, Baojun ;
Zheng, Xinyu ;
Wang, Zhenning ;
Wang, Meixian ;
Dong, Yulan ;
Zhao, Bo ;
Xu, Huimian .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (01) :61-67
[7]   Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in T3 gastric cancer [J].
Hyung, WJ ;
Noh, SH ;
Yoo, CH ;
Huh, JH ;
Shin, DW ;
Lah, KH ;
Lee, JH ;
Choi, SH ;
Min, JS .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 26 (03) :323-329
[8]  
Ichikura T, 1999, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V86, P553, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990815)86:4<553::AID-CNCR2>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-D
[10]   Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer: Comparison of Union International Contra Cancer and Japanese systems [J].
Ikeguchi, M ;
Murakami, D ;
Kanaji, S ;
Ohro, S ;
Maeta, Y ;
Yamaguchi, K ;
Tatebe, S ;
Kondo, A ;
Tsujitani, S ;
Kaibara, N .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 74 (10) :852-854