Active ingredients of substance use-focused self-help groups

被引:115
作者
Moos, Rudolf H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dept Vet Affairs, Ctr Hlth Care Evaluat, Washington, DC 20420 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
abstinence; bonding; coping; goal direction; self-efficacy; self-help; structure;
D O I
10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02111.x
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims and methods This paper provides an overview of some of the probable active ingredients of self-help groups in light of four related theories that identify common social processes that appear to underlie effective psychosocial treatments for and continuing remission from these disorders. Results Social control theory specifies active ingredients such as bonding, goal direction and structure; social learning theory specifies the importance of norms and role models, behavioral economics and behavioral choice theory emphasizes involvement in rewarding activities other than substance use, and stress and coping theory highlights building self-efficacy and effective coping skills. A review of existing studies suggests that the emphasis on these active ingredients probably underlies some aspects of the effectiveness of self-help groups. Conclusions Several issues that need to be addressed to enhance understanding of the active ingredients of action of self-help groups are discussed, including consideration of indices of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) affiliation as active ingredients, identification of personal characteristics that may moderate the influence of active ingredients on substance use outcomes, examination of whether active ingredients of self-help groups, can amplify or compensate for treatment, identification of potential detrimental effects of involvement in self-help groups and focusing on the link between active ingredients of self-help groups and other aspects of the overall recovery milieu, such as the family and social networks.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 396
页数:10
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Bandura A., 1997, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
[2]  
Bickel W.K., 2000, Reframing health behavior change with behavioral economics, DOI 10.4324/9781410605061
[3]  
Biernacki P., 1986, PATHWAYS HEROIN ADDI
[4]   Predictors of abstinence and nonproblem drinking after 12-step treatment in Sweden [J].
Bodin, MC ;
Romelsjö, A .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 2006, 67 (01) :139-146
[5]   Examining the effects of alcoholism typology and AA attendance on self-efficacy as a mechanism of change [J].
Bogenschutz, Michael P. ;
Tonigan, J. Scott ;
Miller, William R. .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 2006, 67 (04) :562-567
[6]   The persistent influence of social networks and alcoholics anonymous on abstinence [J].
Bond, J ;
Kaskutas, LA ;
Weisner, C .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 2003, 64 (04) :579-588
[7]   Spirituality/religiosity promotes acceptance-based responding and 12-step involvement [J].
Carrico, Adam W. ;
Gifford, Elizabeth V. ;
Moos, Rudolf H. .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2007, 89 (01) :66-73
[8]   What is alcoholics anonymous affiliation? [J].
Cloud, RN ;
Ziegler, CH ;
Blondell, RD .
SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, 2004, 39 (07) :1117-1136
[9]   A longitudinal model of intake symptomatology, AA participation and outcome: Retrospective study of the Project MATCH outpatient and aftercare samples [J].
Connors, GJ ;
Tonigan, JS ;
Miller, WR .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 2001, 62 (06) :817-825
[10]   The effects of sponsorship in 12-step treatment of injection drug users [J].
Crape, BL ;
Latkin, CA ;
Laris, AS ;
Knowlton, AR .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2002, 65 (03) :291-301