A latent class analysis of poly-marijuana use among young adults

被引:39
作者
Krauss, Melissa J. [1 ]
Rajbhandari, Biva [1 ]
Sowles, Shaina J. [1 ]
Spitznagel, Edward L. [2 ]
Cavazos-Rehg, Patricia [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, 660 South Euclid Ave,Box 8134, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Math, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Marijuana; Substance use; Marijuana legalization; Drugged driving; USE DISORDERS; DRUG-USE; ADOLESCENT MARIJUANA; UNITED-STATES; CANNABIS USE; TRAJECTORIES; PREVALENCE; OUTCOMES; DANGERS; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.07.021
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Introduction: With more states legalizing marijuana use, the marijuana industry has grown, introducing a variety of marijuana products. Our study explores the use of multiple marijuana products (poly-marijuana use) and the characteristics associated with this behavior. Methods: Past-month marijuana users aged 18-34 years were surveyed online via an existing online panel (n = 2444). Participants answered questions about past-month use of three types of marijuana (plant-based, concentrates, edibles), marijuana use patterns, and driving after use. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of marijuana users. Results: Four classes of marijuana users were identified: Light plant users, who used only plant-based products infrequently and were unlikely to drive after use (32%); Heavy plant users, who used mainly plant-based products frequently, multiple times per day, and were likely to drive after use (37%); Plant and concentrates users, who used plant-based products heavily and concentrates at least infrequently, used multiple times per day, and were likely to drive after use (20%); Light plant and edibles users, who used both products infrequently and were unlikely to drive after use (10%). Those in legal marijuana states were more likely to belong to the poly-marijuana groups. Discussion: Our findings reflect the increase in popularity of new marijuana products in legal states and suggest that heavy user groups, including concentrates users, are associated with driving after use. As various forms of marijuana use increases, monitoring and surveillance of the use of multiple types of marijuana will be important for determining potential varying impacts on physiological and social consequences.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 165
页数:7
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [41] RAMAEKERS JG, 2016, SCI REP UK, V6
  • [42] Are Medical Marijuana Users Different From Recreational Users? The View From Primary Care
    Roy-Byrne, Peter
    Maynard, Charles
    Bumgardner, Kristin
    Krupski, Antoinette
    Dunn, Chris
    West, Imara I.
    Donovan, Dennis
    Atkins, David C.
    Ries, Richard
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL ON ADDICTIONS, 2015, 24 (07) : 599 - 606
  • [43] Smart R G, 1980, NIDA Res Monogr, V30, P46
  • [44] Assessing the Dangers of "Dabbing": Mere Marijuana or Harmful New Trend?
    Stogner, John M.
    Miller, Bryan Lee
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2015, 136 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [45] Climate-smart agriculture: what is it good for?
    Taylor, Marcus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2018, 45 (01) : 89 - 107
  • [46] Thompson GR, 2014, NEW ENGL J MED, V371, P878, DOI [10.1056/NEJMc1407928, 10.1056/NEJMra1402309]
  • [47] Youth Tobacco Cessation Quitting Intentions and Past-Year Quit Attempts
    Tworek, Cindy
    Schauer, Gillian L.
    Wu, Charles C.
    Malarcher, Ann M.
    Jackson, Kia J.
    Hoffman, Allison C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 47 (02) : S15 - S27
  • [48] Divergent marijuana trajectories among men: Socioeconomic, relationship, and life satisfaction outcomes in the mid-30s
    White, Helene R.
    Bechtold, Jordan
    Loeber, Rolf
    Pardini, Dustin
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2015, 156 : 62 - 69
  • [49] Williams K, 2016, COMPLETE LIST CANNAB
  • [50] Sociodemographic and drug use severity differences between medical marijuana users and non-medical users visiting the emergency department
    Woodruff, Susan I.
    Shillington, Audrey M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL ON ADDICTIONS, 2016, 25 (05) : 385 - 391