Effect of subject task on contralateral suppression of click evoked otoacoustic emissions

被引:70
作者
De Boer, Jessica [1 ]
Thornton, A. Roger D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal S Hants Hosp, MRC Inst Hearing Res, Southampton SO14 0YG, Hants, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
medial olivocochlear bundle; otoacoustic emission; contralateral suppression; subject task;
D O I
10.1016/j.heares.2007.08.002
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Contralateral suppression of click evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) is widely used as a non-invasive measure of the activity of the (uncrossed) medial olivocochlear bundle (MOCB). There is evidence that the uMOCB receives descending input from the cortex, potentially mediating top-down control during higher order processing. This study investigated whether the contralateral suppression measure is affected by top-down influences during different tasks performed by the participants during recording. Suppression of CEOAEs evoked at 50 and 60 dB SPL was measured under four different task conditions: (1) no task; (2) passive visual (watching a silent subtitled DVD); (3) active visual (responding to visually presented sums); (4) active auditory (detecting tone pips embedded in the evoking click train). The most significant effect of task was found on the recording noise, with both the passive visual and the active auditory task producing significantly lower noise levels than the no task condition. In the passive visual task, this was associated with a reduced inter-subject variability, which enhanced the effect size relative to the no task condition. A main effect of subject task was also found on the change in CEOAE I/O slope due to contralateral noise. This effect reflected a significantly smaller suppression during the active auditory task compared to the no task condition, leading to a reduced effect size. No significant difference in suppression strength between the no task condition and the two non-auditory tasks was observed, suggesting that the main effect of task reflects a specific effect of auditory attention. The data suggest that MOCB activity is inhibited due to top-down influences when selective attention is focussed on the ipsilateral ear. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 123
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], FRONTIERS BIOSCIENCE
[2]   Reduced auditory efferent activity in childhood selective mutism [J].
Bar-Haim, Y ;
Henkin, Y ;
Ari-Even-Roth, D ;
Schneider, ST ;
Hildesheimer, M ;
Muchnik, C .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 55 (11) :1061-1068
[3]   INFLUENCE OF AUDITORY-STIMULATION AND VISUAL-ATTENTION ON OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS [J].
FERBERVIART, C ;
DUCLAUX, R ;
COLLET, L ;
GUYONNARD, F .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1995, 57 (06) :1075-1079
[4]   SLEEP AND ACTIVE COCHLEAR MICROMECHANICAL PROPERTIES IN HUMAN-SUBJECTS [J].
FROEHLICH, P ;
COLLET, L ;
VALATX, JL ;
MORGON, A .
HEARING RESEARCH, 1993, 66 (01) :1-7
[5]   AUDITORY SELECTIVE ATTENTION IN THE HUMAN COCHLEA [J].
GIARD, MH ;
COLLET, L ;
BOUCHET, P ;
PERNIER, J .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1994, 633 (1-2) :353-356
[6]   Auditory efferents involved in speech-in-noise intelligibility [J].
Giraud, AL ;
Garnier, S ;
Micheyl, C ;
Lina, G ;
Chays, A ;
CheryCroze, S .
NEUROREPORT, 1997, 8 (07) :1779-1783
[7]   Olivocochlear efferents: Anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans [J].
Guinan, John J., Jr. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2006, 27 (06) :589-607
[8]   Evidence of peripheral auditory activity modulation by the auditory cortex in humans [J].
Khalfa, S ;
Bougeard, R ;
Morand, N ;
Veuillet, E ;
Isnard, J ;
Guenot, M ;
Ryvlin, P ;
Fischer, C ;
Collet, L .
NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 104 (02) :347-358
[9]   Peripheral auditory asymmetry in infantile autism [J].
Khalfa, S ;
Bruneau, N ;
Rogé, B ;
Georgieff, N ;
Veuillet, E ;
Adrien, JL ;
Barthélémy, C ;
Collet, L .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 13 (03) :628-632
[10]   Peripheral auditory lateralization assessment using TEOAEs [J].
Khalfa, S ;
Micheyl, C ;
Veuillet, E ;
Collet, L .
HEARING RESEARCH, 1998, 121 (1-2) :29-34