MultiParametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeat Prostate Biopsy

被引:14
|
作者
Huang, Cong [1 ,2 ]
Song, Gang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, He [3 ]
Ji, Guangjie [1 ,2 ]
Li, Jie [4 ]
Chen, Yuke [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Fang, Dong [2 ,5 ]
Xiong, Gengyan [1 ,2 ]
Xin, Zhongcheng [2 ,5 ]
Zhou, Liqun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Urol, Hosp 1, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Natl Urol Canc Ctr China, Inst Urol, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Dept Radiol, Hosp 1, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
[4] Wenzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 5, Lishui Cent Hosp, Dept Urol, Lishui 323000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Univ, Dept Androl, Hosp 1, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
关键词
RISK; PROBABILITY; VALIDATION; ULTRASOUND; GUIDELINES; MRI;
D O I
10.1155/2018/6368309
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Objective. To develop and internally validate nomograms based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to predict prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in patients with a previous negative prostate biopsy. Materials and Methods. The clinicopathological parameters of 231 patients who underwent a repeat systematic prostate biopsy and mpMRI were reviewed. Based on Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System, the mpMRI results were assigned into three groups: Groups "negative," "suspicious," and "positive." Two clinical nomograms for predicting the probabilities of PCa and csPCa were constructed. The performances of nomograms were assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs), calibrations, and decision curve analysis. Results. The median PSA was 15.03 ng/ml and abnormal DRE was presented in 14.3% of patients in the entire cohort. PCa was detected in 75 patients (32.5%), and 59 (25.5%) were diagnosed with csPCa. In multivariate analysis, age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume (PV), digital rectal examination (DRE), and mpMRI finding were significantly independent predictors for PCa and csPCa (all p < 0.01). Of those patients diagnosed with PCa or csPCa, 20/75 (26.7%) and 18/59 (30.5%) had abnormal DRE finding, respectively. Two mpMRI-based nomograms with super predictive accuracy were constructed (AUCs = 0.878 and 0.927, p < 0.001), and both exhibited excellent calibration. Decision curve analysis also demonstrated a high net benefit across a wide range of probability thresholds. Conclusion. mpMRI combined with age, PSA, PV, and DRE can help predict the probability of PCa and csPCa in patients who underwent a repeat systematic prostate biopsy after a previous negative biopsy. The two nomograms may aid the decision-making process in men with prior benign histology before the performance of repeat prostate biopsy.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Image Targeted Prostate Biopsy Versus Transperineal Template Prostate Biopsy in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Labanaris, Apostolos P.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (03) : 866 - 866
  • [32] Diagnostic Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Targeted Biopsy to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer
    Hoffmann, Manuela A.
    Taymoorian, Kasra
    Ruf, Christian
    Gerhards, Arnd
    Leyendecker, Karlheinz
    Stein, Thomas
    Jakobs, Frank M.
    Schreckenberger, Mathias
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (12) : 6871 - 6877
  • [33] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer
    An, Julie Y.
    Sidana, Abhinav
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Turkbey, Ismail Baris
    BALKAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 34 (05) : 388 - 396
  • [34] Development and validation of a predictive model for determining clinically significant prostate cancer in men with negative magnetic resonance imaging after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy
    Liu, Gang
    Zhu, Yuze
    Yao, Zichuan
    Jiang, Yunzhong
    Wu, Bin
    Bai, Song
    PROSTATE, 2021, 81 (13) : 983 - 991
  • [35] ROLE OF MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN PROSTATE CANCER ASSESSMENT
    Tomaskovic, Igor
    Knezevic, Matej
    Pezelj, Ivan
    Culo, Karolina Bolanca
    Novosel, Luka
    Nikles, Sven
    Tomic, Miroslav
    Justinic, Danijel
    Nincevic, Josip
    Pirsa, Matea
    Ruzic, Boris
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2018, 57 : 35 - 39
  • [36] MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION
    Garcia-Cruz, Eduardo
    Ramon-Barcelo, Catalina
    Carrion-Puig, Ramon
    Alcaraz, Antonio
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2019, 72 (04): : 374 - 380
  • [37] Nomograms for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PI-RADS-3 biparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Liang, Zhen
    Feng, Tianrui
    Zhou, Yi
    Yang, Yongjiao
    Sun, Yujiao
    Zhou, Zhien
    Yan, Weigang
    Cao, Fenghong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [38] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Prediction of Prostate Cancer Risk
    Bianchi, Giampaolo
    Sighinolfi, Maria Chiara
    Rocco, Bernardo
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2018, 4 (11) : 1624 - 1625
  • [39] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Durmus, T.
    Baur, A.
    Hamm, B.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2014, 186 (03): : 238 - 246
  • [40] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Durmus, T.
    Baur, A.
    Hamm, B.
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2014, 45 (02) : 119 - 126