Interplanetary drivers of ionospheric prompt penetration electric fields

被引:17
作者
Guo, Jianpeng [1 ]
Feng, Xueshang [1 ]
Zuo, Pingbing [1 ]
Zhang, Jie [2 ]
Wei, Yong [3 ]
Zong, Qiugang [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Ctr Space Sci & Appl Res, State Key Lab Space Weather, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] George Mason Univ, Dept Computat & Data Sci, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[3] Peking Univ, Sch Earth & Space Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Interplanetary electric field; Equatorial electric field; MC structures; Electric field penetration; SOLAR-WIND; BOUNDARY-LAYERS; MAGNETIC CLOUDS; SIGNATURES; STORMS; SHOCK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jastp.2010.01.010
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
In this paper we discussed the penetration effects of common interplanetary magnetic cloud (MC) structures like sheath region, both sheath and magnetic cloud boundary layer (MCBL), MC body, and shock-running into a preceding MC on the equatorial ionosphere during intense (SYM-H <= 100 nT) geomagnetic storms. Using solar wind data obtained from the ACE and WIND spacecraft, we have identified these four types of MC structures responsible for the electric field penetration events detected by Jicamarca incoherent scatter radar. After elimination of the propagation delay, the observations show that the equatorial electric field (EEF) was changed immediately following the arrival of solar wind disturbance. Moreover, the duration of EEF corresponded well with that of the corresponding MC structure interval. We suggest that identifying the solar wind structures associated with penetration electric field may shed light on the understanding of the penetration processes and further help exploring their effects on the ionospheric plasma. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 136
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
BURLAGA L, 1981, J GEOPHYS RES-SPACE, V86, P6673, DOI 10.1029/JA086iA08p06673
[2]   Heliospheric magnetic field strength and polarity from 1 to 81 AU during the ascending phase of solar cycle 23 [J].
Burlaga, LF ;
Ness, NF ;
Wang, YM ;
Sheeley, NR .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2002, 107 (A11)
[3]   Interplanetary coronal mass ejections in the near-Earth solar wind during 1996-2002 [J].
Cane, HV ;
Richardson, IG .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2003, 108 (A4)
[4]  
Chau JL, 2004, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V31, DOI [10.1029/2004GL021620, 10.1029/2004GL020800]
[5]   INTERPLANETARY MAGNETIC FIELD AND AURORAL ZONES [J].
DUNGEY, JW .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1961, 6 (02) :47-&
[6]   SPECTRAL STUDIES OF THE SOURCES OF IONOSPHERIC ELECTRIC-FIELDS [J].
EARLE, GD ;
KELLEY, MC .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1987, 92 (A1) :213-224
[7]   Equatorial ionospheric electric fields during the November 2004 magnetic storm [J].
Fejer, B. G. ;
Jensen, J. W. ;
Kikuchi, T. ;
Abdu, M. A. ;
Chau, J. L. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2007, 112 (A10)
[8]  
FEJER BG, 1990, ANN GEOPHYS, V8, P441
[9]   RESPONSE OF THE THERMOSPHERE AND IONOSPHERE TO GEOMAGNETIC STORMS [J].
FULLERROWELL, TJ ;
CODRESCU, MV ;
MOFFETT, RJ ;
QUEGAN, S .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1994, 99 (A3) :3893-3914
[10]   Radio signatures of coronal mass ejection interaction: Coronal mass ejection cannibalism? [J].
Gopalswamy, N ;
Yashiro, S ;
Kaiser, ML ;
Howard, RA ;
Bougeret, JL .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 548 (01) :L91-L94