The Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator From the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Underestimates the Risk of High Grade Cancer in Contemporary Referral Patients

被引:17
作者
Ngo, Tin C.
Turnbull, Brit B. [1 ]
Lavori, Philip W. [1 ]
Presti, Joseph C., Jr.
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol & Hlth Res & Policy, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; risk; nomograms; prognosis; MORTALITY; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.101
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The prostate cancer risk calculator from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial estimates the risk of positive biopsy and 1 containing high grade disease (Gleason score 7 or greater) based on prostate specific antigen, digital rectal examination, family history, race and prior negative biopsy. Since data used to create the calculator came from an unreferred population that underwent mainly sextant biopsy, to our knowledge its usefulness in the contemporary urology practice is unknown. Materials and Methods: We performed the same multivariate logistic regression used to derive the prostate cancer risk calculator in a cohort of men from the Stanford Prostate Needle Biopsy Database who underwent initial prostate needle biopsy using an extended 12-core scheme. Results: Our predictions of overall prostate cancer risk did not differ significantly from those of the calculator. Prostate specific antigen, abnormal digital rectal examination and family history were independent risk factors. However, our model predicted a much greater risk of high grade disease than the prostate cancer risk calculator. Prostate specific antigen, abnormal digital rectal examination and age were independent risk factors for high grade disease. Conclusions: The difference between our estimated risk of high grade prostate cancer and that of the prostate cancer risk calculator can be potentially explained by 1) differences between the cohorts (referred vs unreferred) or 2) the difference in grading, ie grading accuracy due to the difference in biopsy schemes or to temporally related grade shifts. Caution should be used when applying the prostate cancer risk calculator to counsel patients referred for suspicion of prostate cancer since it underestimates the risk of high grade disease.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 487
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Prostate cancer and the Will Rogers phenomenon [J].
Albertsen, PC ;
Hanley, JA ;
Barrows, GH ;
Penson, DF ;
Kowalczyk, PDH ;
Sanders, MM ;
Fine, J .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (17) :1248-1253
[2]   Mortality Results from a Randomized Prostate-Cancer Screening Trial [J].
Andriole, Gerald L. ;
Grubb, Robert L., III ;
Buys, Saundra S. ;
Chia, David ;
Church, Timothy R. ;
Fouad, Mona N. ;
Gelmann, Edward P. ;
Kvale, Paul A. ;
Reding, Douglas J. ;
Weissfeld, Joel L. ;
Yokochi, Lance A. ;
Crawford, E. David ;
O'Brien, Barbara ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Rathmell, Joshua M. ;
Riley, Thomas L. ;
Hayes, Richard B. ;
Kramer, Barnett S. ;
Izmirlian, Grant ;
Miller, Anthony B. ;
Pinsky, Paul F. ;
Prorok, Philip C. ;
Gohagan, John K. ;
Berg, Christine D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (13) :1310-1319
[3]   Common Variants at 8q24 Are Associated With Prostate Cancer Risk in Taiwanese Men [J].
Chen, Marcelo ;
Huang, Yu-Chuen ;
Yang, Stone ;
Hsu, Jong-Ming ;
Chang, Yen-Hwa ;
Huang, William Ji-Shian ;
Chen, Yi-Ming Arthur .
PROSTATE, 2010, 70 (05) :502-507
[4]   The effectiveness of screening for prostate cancer - A nested case-control study [J].
Concato, J ;
Wells, CK ;
Horwitz, RI ;
Penson, D ;
Fincke, G ;
Berlowitz, DR ;
Froehlich, G ;
Blake, D ;
Vickers, MA ;
Gehr, GA ;
Raheb, NH ;
Sullivan, G ;
Peduzzi, P .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 166 (01) :38-43
[5]   Validation in a Multiple Urology Practice Cohort of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Calculator for Predicting Prostate Cancer Detection [J].
Eyre, Stephen J. ;
Ankerst, Donna P. ;
Wei, John T. ;
Nair, Prakash V. ;
Regan, Meredith M. ;
Bueti, Gerrardina ;
Tang, Jeffrey ;
Rubin, Mark A. ;
Kearney, Michael ;
Thompson, Ian M. ;
Sanda, Martin G. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (06) :2653-2658
[6]   Predicting the outcome of prostate biopsy: comparison of a novel logistic regression-based model, the prostate cancer risk calculator, and prostate-specific antigen level alone [J].
Hernandez, David J. ;
Han, Misop ;
Humphreys, Elizabeth B. ;
Mangold, Leslie A. ;
Taneja, Samir S. ;
Childs, Stacy J. ;
Bartsch, Georg ;
Partin, Alan W. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 103 (05) :609-614
[7]  
Jemal A, 2009, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V59, P225, DOI [10.3322/caac.20006, 10.3322/caac.21387]
[8]   Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: Implications for radiotherapy patients [J].
King, CR ;
McNeal, JE ;
Gill, H ;
Presti, JC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (02) :386-391
[9]   Prostate biopsy: Indications and technique [J].
Matlaga, BR ;
Eskew, LA ;
McCullough, DL .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (01) :12-19
[10]   Performance of Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator in a Contemporary Cohort Screened for Prostate Cancer and Diagnosed by Extended Prostate Biopsy [J].
Nguyen, Carvell T. ;
Yu, Changhong ;
Moussa, Ayman ;
Kattan, Michael W. ;
Jones, J. Stephen .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (02) :529-533