Port management and multiple-criteria decision making under uncertainty

被引:20
|
作者
Garcia-Morales, Rafael M. [1 ]
Baquerizo, Asuncion [1 ]
Angel Losada, Miguel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Grp Environm Fluid Dynam, Andalusian Inst Earth Syst Res IISTA, Granada 18006, Spain
关键词
Port management; Decision making; Intrinsic uncertainty; Multi-criteria analysis; Port operation; Risk analysis; MULTICRITERIA ACCEPTABILITY ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.05.007
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
The methodology for port management in this study takes into account the stochastic nature of climate as well as of use and exploitation agents. It provides a probabilistic characterization of the performance of different alternatives in terms of a set of indicators that reflect the potential benefits for different interest groups. The joint distribution functions thus obtained for a set of pre-defined management alternatives are used to compare strategies and to make decisions, based on stochastic multi-criteria analysis. This method, which also addresses the uncertainty of decision-maker preferences, ranked the strategies, and at the same time, specified the typical decision-maker preferences for each strategy. In the analysis of a hypothetical port, four alternatives were designed as solutions for port congestion. The criteria selected were the service quality provided to vessels, the total goods handled and the profits accrued by the Port Authority. The criteria measuring the performance of each strategy were statistically analyzed first. Then, assuming the uniform distribution of decision-maker preferences, the alternatives were ranked, and the relative importance of each criterion in the decision-making process was obtained. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 39
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Selection of discrete multiple criteria decision making methods in the presence of risk and uncertainty
    Haddad, Malik
    Sanders, David
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH PERSPECTIVES, 2018, 5 : 357 - 370
  • [22] Decision making under uncertainty
    Huettel, Scott A.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
  • [23] Multiple-criteria evaluation for value management in civil engineering
    Sánchez, M
    Prats, F
    Agell, N
    Ormazabal, G
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2005, 21 (03) : 131 - 137
  • [24] Stochastic multiple-criteria decision making with 2-tuple aspirations: a method based on disappointment stochastic dominance
    Liang, Xia
    Jiang, Yanping
    Liu, Peide
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (03) : 913 - 940
  • [25] APPLICATION OF MULTIPLE-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING TECHNIQUES AND APPROACHES TO EVALUATING OF SERVICE QUALITY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
    Mardani, Abbas
    Jusoh, Ahmad
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Khalifah, Zainab
    Nor, Khalil Md
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 16 (05) : 1034 - 1068
  • [26] Complex T-spherical fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and their applications in multiple-criteria decision-making
    Faruk Karaaslan
    Mohammed Allaw Dawood Dawood
    Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2021, 7 : 2711 - 2734
  • [27] An Application of Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis for Risk Prioritization and Management: A Case Study of the Fisheries Sector in Pakistan
    Mohsin, Muhammad
    Yin Hengbin
    Zhang Luyao
    Li Rui
    Qian Chong
    Mehak, Ana
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (14)
  • [28] On some analogies between one-criterion decision making under uncertainty and multi-criteria decision making under certainty
    Gaspars-Wieloch, Helena
    ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS REVIEW, 2021, 7 (02) : 17 - 36
  • [29] Determining dry port criteria that support decision making
    Rodrigues, Thiago de Almeida
    de Miranda Mota, Caroline Maria
    dos Santos, Inez Manuele
    RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS, 2021, 88
  • [30] Selection of the Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Method for Evaluation of Sustainable Energy Development: A Case Study of Poland
    Trojanowska, Malgorzata
    Necka, Krzysztof
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (23)