Accounting for Latent Attitudes in Willingness-to-Pay Studies: The Case of Coastal Water Quality Improvements in Tobago

被引:109
作者
Hess, Stephane [1 ]
Beharry-Borg, Nesha [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Inst Transport Studies, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Sustainable Resources Inst, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Integrated Choice and Latent Variable (ICLV) model; Discrete choice; Latent attitude; Coastal water; Beach recreation; Taste heterogeneity; CHOICE MODELS; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-011-9522-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The study of human behaviour and in particular individual choices is of great interest in the field of environmental economics. Substantial attention has been paid to the way in which preferences vary across individuals, and there is a realisation that such differences are at least in part due to underlying attitudes and convictions. While this has been confirmed in empirical work, the methods typically employed are based on the arguably misguided use of responses to attitudinal questions as direct measures of underlying attitudes. As discussed in other literature, especially in transport research, this potentially leads to measurement error and endogeneity bias, and attitudes should rather be treated as latent variables. In this paper, we illustrate the use of such an Integrated Choice and Latent Variable model in the context of beach visitors' willingness-to-pay for improvements in water quality. We show how a latent attitudinal variable, which we refer to as a pro-intervention attitude, helps explain both the responses from the stated choice exercise as well as answers to various rating questions related to respondent attitudes. The incorporation of the latent variable leads to important gains in model fit and substantially different willingness-to-pay patterns.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 131
页数:23
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]   A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit [J].
Greene, WH ;
Hensher, DA .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2003, 37 (08) :681-698
[22]  
Harris KM, 1999, J ECONOMETRICS, V89, P131
[23]   Should Reference Alternatives in Pivot Design SC Surveys be Treated Differently? [J].
Hess, Stephane ;
Rose, John M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2009, 42 (03) :297-317
[24]   The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice [J].
Johansson, MV ;
Heldt, T ;
Johansson, P .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2006, 40 (06) :507-525
[25]  
Menezes LD, 1996, J R STAT SOC A STAT
[26]   Latent preferences and valuation of wetland ecosystem restoration [J].
Milon, JW ;
Scrogin, D .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 56 (02) :162-175
[27]   Using angler characteristics and attitudinal data to identify environmental preference classes: A latent-class model [J].
Morey, E ;
Thacher, J ;
Breffle, W .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2006, 34 (01) :91-115
[28]   Using attitudinal data to identify latent classes that vary in their preference for landscape preservation [J].
Morey, Edward ;
Thiene, Mara ;
De Salvo, Maria ;
Signorello, Giovanni .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 68 (1-2) :536-546
[30]   The role of farmers' behavioral attitudes and heterogeneity in futures contracts usage [J].
Pennings, JME ;
Leuthold, RM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 82 (04) :908-919