Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Primary, Qualitative Meta-Analytic, and Mixed Methods Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report

被引:1043
作者
Levitt, Heidi M. [1 ]
Bamberg, Michael [2 ]
Creswell, John W. [3 ]
Frost, David M. [4 ]
Josselson, Ruthellen [5 ]
Suarez-Orozco, Carola [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Psychol, 100 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 02466 USA
[2] Clark Univ, Dept Psychol, Worcester, MA 01610 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Med Sch, Dept Family Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] UCL, Dept Social Sci, London, England
[5] Fielding Grad Univ, Sch Psychol, Santa Clara, CA USA
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Grad Sch Educ, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
qualitative research methods; qualitative meta-analysis; reporting standards; mixed methods; APA Style; COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY; PARADIGMS; CONDUCT;
D O I
10.1037/amp0000151
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The American Psychological Association Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Research (JARS-Qual Working Group) was charged with examining the state of journal article reporting standards as they applied to qualitative research and with generating recommendations for standards that would be appropriate for a wide range of methods within the discipline of psychology. These standards describe what should be included in a research report to enable and facilitate the review process. This publication marks a historical moment-the first inclusion of qualitative research in APA Style, which is the basis of both the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA, 2010) and APA Style CENTRAL, an online program to support APA Style. In addition to the general JARS-Qual guidelines, the Working Group has developed standards for both qualitative meta-analysis and mixed methods research. The reporting standards were developed for psychological qualitative research but may hold utility for a broad range of social sciences. They honor a range of qualitative traditions, methods, and reporting styles. The Working Group was composed of a group of researchers with backgrounds in varying methods, research topics, and approaches to inquiry. In this article, they present these standards and their rationale, and they detail the ways that the standards differ from the quantitative research reporting standards. They describe how the standards can be used by authors in the process of writing qualitative research for submission as well as by reviewers and editors in the process of reviewing research.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 46
页数:21
相关论文
共 85 条
[31]  
Bamberg M., 2012, APA handbook of research methods in psychology, V2, P85, DOI DOI 10.1037/13620-006
[32]  
Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
[33]   Ethnic minority clients' perceptions of the significance of race in cross-racial therapy relationships [J].
Chang, Doris F. ;
Yoon, Patricia .
PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2011, 21 (05) :567-582
[34]  
Creswell J., 2015, SAGE
[35]  
Creswell J.W., 2013, SAGE
[36]  
DANZIGER K, 1979, J HIST BEHAV SCI, V15, P205, DOI 10.1002/1520-6696(197907)15:3<205::AID-JHBS2300150303>3.0.CO
[37]  
2-P
[38]   Publishing a Methodological Mixed Methods Research Article [J].
Fetters, Michael D. ;
Freshwater, Dawn .
JOURNAL OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH, 2015, 9 (03) :203-213
[39]   Echoes of Bedford. A 20-Year Social Psychology Memoir on Participatory Action Research Hatched Behind Bars [J].
Fine, Michelle .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2013, 68 (08) :687-698
[40]   Use of content analysis to conduct knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews [J].
Finfgeld-Connett, Deborah .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2014, 14 (03) :341-352