Multi-Objective Optimization of Spatially Truss Structures Based on Node Movement

被引:14
|
作者
Nan, Bo [1 ]
Bai, Yikui [1 ]
Wu, Yue [2 ]
机构
[1] Shenyang Agr Univ, Coll Water Conservancy, Shenyang 110866, Peoples R China
[2] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 06期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
structure optimization; MOEA optimization algorithm; Pareto frontier; optimal solutions; Ground Structure Approach; ALGORITHMS; TOPOLOGY; PSO;
D O I
10.3390/app10061964
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
This paper discusses the solutions for topology optimization of spatially discrete structures. The optimization objects are the structural weight and the maximum displacement. The optimization variables include structural node coordinates, and the improved MOEA (Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm) method is used to optimize the structure. The innovation of this study is that it breaks through the shortage of constant node position in the optimization thought of traditionally discrete structure in the "Ground Structure Approach" and uses the coordinate of the node as the optimization variable for the optimization calculation. The result is not a single one but a set of optimal solutions through the evolution (i.e., Pareto optimal solutions); on this basis, the most suitable solution can be found according to the boundary conditions or other related requirements. Using the C# language to compile the calculation program, ANSYS finite element software is used to analyze the structure, and the Pareto front surface was automatically drawn to determine the optimal layout form of the discrete structure. The analysis results show that the improved MOEA method can provide an effective method to solve such optimization problems.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multi-objective modified heat transfer search for truss optimization
    Sumit Kumar
    Ghanshyam G. Tejani
    Nantiwat Pholdee
    Sujin Bureerat
    Engineering with Computers, 2021, 37 : 3439 - 3454
  • [22] Multi-Objective Optimization With Multiple Spatially Distributed Surrogates
    Bhattacharjee, Kalyan Shankar
    Singh, Hemant Kumar
    Ray, Tapabrata
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2016, 138 (09)
  • [23] Multi-Objective Optimization of Node-Based Spacecraft Radiator Design
    Kim, Hui-Kyung
    Jo, Yeongmin
    Choi, Seongim
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2014, 51 (05) : 1695 - 1708
  • [24] WSN Sensor Node Placement Approach based on Multi-Objective Optimization
    Abidin, H. Zainol
    Din, N. M.
    Radzi, N. A. M.
    2014 IEEE REGION 10 SYMPOSIUM, 2014, : 111 - 115
  • [25] Multi-objective sizing and topology optimization of truss structures using genetic programming based on a new adaptive mutant operator
    Assimi, Hirad
    Jamali, Ali
    Nariman-zadeh, Nader
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2019, 31 (10): : 5729 - 5749
  • [26] Multi-objective sizing and topology optimization of truss structures using genetic programming based on a new adaptive mutant operator
    Hirad Assimi
    Ali Jamali
    Nader Nariman-zadeh
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2019, 31 : 5729 - 5749
  • [27] An adaptive multi-objective immune algorithm for optimal design of truss structures
    Research Institute of Structural Engineering and Disaster Reduction, Tongji University, Shanghai
    200092, China
    不详
    200092, China
    不详
    J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng., 1600, 3 (557-564):
  • [28] An Adaptive Multi-objective Immune Algorithm for Optimal Design of Truss Structures
    Xie, Liyu
    Tang, Hesheng
    Hu, Changyuan
    Xue, Songtao
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ARCHITECTURE AND BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2016, 15 (03) : 557 - 564
  • [29] Multi-objective Optimization for the Design of Salary Structures
    Tremblay, Francois-Alexandre
    Piche-Meunier, Dominique
    Dubois, Louis
    INTEGRATION OF CONSTRAINT PROGRAMMING, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, AND OPERATIONS RESEARCH, CPAIOR 2023, 2023, 13884 : 427 - 442
  • [30] Multi-objective discrete optimization of laminated structures
    Spallino, R
    Rizzo, S
    MECHANICS RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2002, 29 (01) : 17 - 25