Pharmacopolitics and deliberative democracy

被引：36

作者：

Rawlins, MD

机构：

[1] Natl Inst Hlth & Clin Excellence, London WC1V 6NA, England

[2] Univ Newcastle, Wolfson Unit Clin Pharmacol, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia

来源：

CLINICAL MEDICINE | 2005年 / 5卷 / 05期

关键词：

distributive justice; NICE; pharmacopolitics; procedural justice; social value judgements in healthcare;

D O I：

10.7861/clinmedicine.5-5-471

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

Setting priorities in healthcare has become a highly politicised activity. Traditionally it has been undertaken by government and the health professions but there is an increasing imperative to involve the public. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has established a Citizens' Council as an attempt to capture the informed views of the public in shaping the Institute's social value judgements' Although, in the future, better ways of involving the public may emerge, NICE's approach represents one way in which ordinary citizens can engage in the process of prioritising healthcare.

引用

页码：471 / 475

页数：5

共 21 条

[1]

Beauchamp TL, 1989, The Principles of biomedical ethics, V3rd

[2]

BEGG E, 2003, J N Z MED ASS, V116, pU360

[3] UNDERREPORTING RESEARCH IS SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT [J].

CHALMERS, I .

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 263 (10) :1405-1408

[4]

Chambers R, 2000, Involving Patients and the Public. How to do it better

[5]

Coote Anna, 1997, Citizens' Juries: Theory into Practice

[6]

Daemmrich AA., 2004, Pharmacopolitics: Drug Regulation in the United States and Germany

[7]

Daniels Norman., 1985, Just Health Care

[8]

Daniels NormanJames E. Sabin., 2002, SETTING LIMITS FAIRL

[9]

Davies C, 2005, OPENING BOX EVALUATI

[10]

Gutmann Amy., 1996, Democracy and Disagreement

← 1 2 3 →